The United States of America in Iraq: A Nation Without Honor
Posted in Michael O'McCarthy's Blog, Main Blog (All Posts) on August 27th, 2007 2:43 pm by Michael O'Mccarthy
by Michael O’McCarthy
There is a smell – an odor, in the air. It is fetid rot. It is a toxic mix of the blackening blood of the murdered and seeping red of the wounded. It has seeped down mixing with the ancient putrefaction of the long dead buried hundreds of feet below the dust-sand surface, oil-well riddled land of Iraq. This cancerous odor has a name and it has saturated the earth before – most recently in South East Asia: It’s name is U. S. foreign policy.
Now that the Idiot Prince has introduced the subject of “the Vietnam War” it is time to compare the honor of the nation state, the United States of America, with its origins and its last adventure in imperial rule.
This tarnished “democratic” state was founded by European males bent on creating a “republican” form of governance that would be for and by men of European origin, of a plantation and merchant class that patently excluded people of color, women and men without substance. It was driven by the notion of private ownership of both the land to be conquered and of the native peoples of both the “Americas” and Africa. These racist, Christian obsessed males saw no contradiction in forging a “democracy” free of monarchial terror and at the same time based on genocide and the oppression and exploitation of one half of the human race, women, and the slave labor of children.
And it is NOT the comparison with other modern states as they evolved out of monarchy and autocratic rule that is at issue. One can simply look at the failed Communist experiments in a people’s social democracy in the Soviet Union and the People’s Republic of China to understand that all revolutions opposing monarchy did not realize the democratic necessity of “one person, one vote” rule.
The point here is that the United States has promoted its image as the “Land of the Free,” the “Beacon of Democracy for the world,” the “Leader of the Free World” that requires examination and in that examination, condemnation for its long history of terror … and its self-serving failure to live up to its own mandate. At the very heart of its current foreign policy is this cancerous growth.



























