<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Hollywood Liberal &#187; Main Blog (All Posts)</title>
	<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com</link>
	<description>A Hollywood Tradition Since 2004</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Tattlesnake – Big Media Hillary Silly Season in Full Swing Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/the-tattlesnake-%e2%80%93-big-media-hillary-silly-season-in-full-swing-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/the-tattlesnake-%e2%80%93-big-media-hillary-silly-season-in-full-swing-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/the-tattlesnake-%e2%80%93-big-media-hillary-silly-season-in-full-swing-edition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tattlesnake – Big Media Hillary Silly Season in Full Swing Edition 		Secretary of State Clinton? Much A Doo-Doo About Nothing If it hasn&#8217;t been foreclosed on yet, don&#8217;t bet the family ranch that Hillary Clinton will be the next Secretary of State, nor even have a cabinet post in the Obama Administration. With the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2008/11/18/the-tattlesnake-–-big-media-hillary-silly-season-in-full-swing-edition/ 		" >The Tattlesnake – Big Media Hillary Silly Season in Full Swing Edition 		</a><br />Secretary of State Clinton? Much A Doo-Doo About Nothing If it hasn&#8217;t been foreclosed on yet, don&#8217;t bet the family ranch that Hillary Clinton will be the next Secretary of State, nor even have a cabinet post in the Obama Administration. With the long, slow political-junkie orgasm of the presidential campaign fading in the rearview mirror, the [&#8230;]
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/bartcop/vWnb?a=akNycw"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/bartcop/vWnb?i=akNycw" border="0"></img></a></p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bartcop/vWnb?a=aGVvN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bartcop/vWnb?i=aGVvN" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/the-tattlesnake-%e2%80%93-big-media-hillary-silly-season-in-full-swing-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Interview Seen By 25 Million</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/obama-interview-seen-by-25-million/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/obama-interview-seen-by-25-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/obama-interview-seen-by-25-million/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama Interview Seen By 25 Million             The 60 Minutes interview with President-elect Barack Obama drew 25.1 million viewers last Sunday, the largest audience among all the programs on television so far this season.
The audience was also the program&#8217;s largest in nearly a decade. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/B_MoMQJ3al8/obama_interview_seen_by_25_million.html             " >Obama Interview Seen By 25 Million             </a><br />The <i>60 Minutes</i> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2008/11/17/obama_on_60_minutes.html">interview</a> with President-elect Barack Obama drew 25.1 million viewers last Sunday, the largest audience among all the programs on television so far this season.</p>
<p>The audience was also the program&#8217;s largest in nearly a decade.<br /> 
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/tQOQcHigA7JISgzD0POqQlq0y0o/a"><img src="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/tQOQcHigA7JISgzD0POqQlq0y0o/i" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/B_MoMQJ3al8" height="1" width="1"/>             </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/obama-interview-seen-by-25-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Late Late Nite FDL: Little Joy &#038; The Morning Benders</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/late-late-nite-fdl-little-joy-the-morning-benders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/late-late-nite-fdl-little-joy-the-morning-benders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/late-late-nite-fdl-little-joy-the-morning-benders/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late Late Nite FDL: Little Joy &#038; The Morning Benders 		Tonight we have two California bands. Starting with a new video from Los Angeles, Little Joy, performing Unattainable, off their new CD, Little Joy. Followed by Berkeley&#8217;s, The Morning Benders, hillside performance of Crosseyed.





Little Joy &#8220;Unattainable&#8221; 






The Morning Benders &#8220;Crosseyed&#8221; 
Tonight we have two California [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/17/late-late-nite-fdl-little-joy-the-morning-benders/ 		" >Late Late Nite FDL: Little Joy &#038; The Morning Benders 		</a><br />Tonight we have two California bands. Starting with a new video from Los Angeles, Little Joy, performing Unattainable, off their new CD, Little Joy. Followed by Berkeley&#8217;s, The Morning Benders, hillside performance of Crosseyed.
<div class='hitEmbed_none'><object width="350" height="283">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Qs6WFMJGxE8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Qs6WFMJGxE8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="350" height="283"></embed></object></div>
</p>
<p><strong>Little Joy &#8220;Unattainable&#8221; </strong></p>
<p>
<div class='hitEmbed_none'><object width="350" height="283">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/68BNEOJH8PU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/68BNEOJH8PU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="350" height="283"></embed></object></div>
</p>
<p><strong>The Morning Benders &#8220;Crosseyed&#8221; </strong></p>
<p>Tonight we have two California bands. Starting with a new video from Los Angeles, <strong><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.myspace.com/littlejoymusic"><em>Little Joy</em></a></strong>, performing <em>Unattainable</em>, off their new CD, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/23658697/review/23947378/little_joy">Little Joy</a>. Followed by Berkeley&#8217;s, <strong><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.myspace.com/themorningbenders"><em>The Morning Benders</em></a></strong>, hillside performance of <em>Crosseyed</em>.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s on your mind tonight?</p>
<p></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/late-late-nite-fdl-little-joy-the-morning-benders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep it Simple: Stop the Foreclosure Crisis with the Right to Rent</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/keep-it-simple-stop-the-foreclosure-crisis-with-the-right-to-rent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/keep-it-simple-stop-the-foreclosure-crisis-with-the-right-to-rent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/keep-it-simple-stop-the-foreclosure-crisis-with-the-right-to-rent/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep it Simple: Stop the Foreclosure Crisis with the Right to Rent 		There are a lot of complicated plans being discussed, but sometimes the simplest solution to a problem is best. 		]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.alternet.org/workplace/107572/keep_it_simple:_stop_the_foreclosure_crisis_with_the_right_to_rent/ 		" >Keep it Simple: Stop the Foreclosure Crisis with the Right to Rent 		</a><br />There are a lot of complicated plans being discussed, but sometimes the simplest solution to a problem is best. 		</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/keep-it-simple-stop-the-foreclosure-crisis-with-the-right-to-rent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo Parrots Industry Line On New &#8220;Privacy&#8221; Group</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/wapo-parrots-industry-line-on-new-privacy-group/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/wapo-parrots-industry-line-on-new-privacy-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/wapo-parrots-industry-line-on-new-privacy-group/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WaPo Parrots Industry Line On New &#8220;Privacy&#8221; Group    Looks like The Washington Post got spun just a bit on a story about a new group said to be advocating for increased online privacy. Under the milquetoast headline, &#8220;A New Voice in Online Privacy: Group Wants Tighter Rules for&#8230;    ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TPMmuckraker/~3/pgVscHvNHN8/wapo_parrots_industry_line_on.php    " >WaPo Parrots Industry Line On New &#8220;Privacy&#8221; Group    </a><br />Looks like The Washington Post got spun just a bit on a story about a new group said to be advocating for increased online privacy. Under the milquetoast headline, &#8220;A New Voice in Online Privacy: Group Wants Tighter Rules for&#8230;    </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/wapo-parrots-industry-line-on-new-privacy-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loaded Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/loaded-questions-8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/loaded-questions-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/loaded-questions-8/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Loaded Questions We dug into the internals on the latest Fox News poll, and some of the questions might surprise you (or might not, since it&#8217;s Fox). Example: Have you heard any of your friends and neighbors say there is something about&#8230; ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Talking-Points-Memo/~3/344984747/205539.php " >Loaded Questions </a><br />We dug into the internals on the latest Fox News poll, and some of the questions might surprise you (or might not, since it&#8217;s Fox). Example: Have you heard any of your friends and neighbors say there is something about&#8230; </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/loaded-questions-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Not About Lieberman, It&#8217;s About 60</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/its-not-about-lieberman-its-about-60/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/its-not-about-lieberman-its-about-60/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/its-not-about-lieberman-its-about-60/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s Not About Lieberman, It&#8217;s About 60          
Sen. Joe Lieberman is an awful person who lacks principles. He won re-election in 2006 by pretending he was against the Iraq War. After spending a career advocating Democratic domestic policies, he spent the 2008 spouting conservative distortions of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.liberaloasis.com/2008/11/its_not_about_lieberman_its_ab.php          " >It&#8217;s Not About Lieberman, It&#8217;s About 60          </a>
<p><strong>Sen. Joe Lieberman is an awful person who lacks principles</strong>. He won re-election in 2006 by pretending he was against the Iraq War. After spending a career advocating Democratic domestic policies, he spent the 2008 spouting conservative distortions of core Democratic principles. He is more motivated by personal pique than the public interest. He is dishonest and untrustworthy.</p>
<p>And it <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/18/lieberman-keeps-committee_n_144625.html">completely doesn&#8217;t matter that he kept his committee chairmanship.</a></p>
<p>What matters? <strong>Passing legislation</strong> that averts a climate crisis, provides health care to all, and modernizes our infrastructure.</p>
<p>We get those things done, we not only get the economy back on track. </p>
<p>We not only make clean energy and health care affordable and accessible to all. </p>
<p>We show that liberal progressive government can deliver, and we <strong>lock it in for a generation.</strong></p>
<p>The chief threat to achieving these goals is falling short of the 60 votes needed in the Senate to cut off filibusters.</p>
<p>On any given issue, it is possible that getting the 60 vote supermajority will require scratching and clawing. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s not a lot of room for error, and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.liberaloasis.com/2008/11/getting_to_60.php">it is myopic to unnecessarily alienate anyone that could be in the 60</a> &#8212; regardless of how much of a petulant jerk he or she is. </p>
<p>(And if we&#8217;re not doing business with petulant jerks, we won&#8217;t get 10 votes in the Senate, let alone 60.)</p>
<p>As Lieberman has shown that he is driven more by personal pique than principle, <strong>giving the baby his bottle is perfectly understandable</strong>, if decidedly unpleasant.</p>
<p>Because if Lieberman helps squelch filibusters on the big issues that matter, it is a very small price to pay.</p>
<p>Also, as a secondary matter, no one seems to think <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/11/18/ST2008111802252.html">stripping Lieberman of his environmental subcommittee chairmanship</a> is significant. But arguably it&#8217;s more significant than his Homeland Security committee chairmanship.</p>
<p>Again, global warming is one of the issues that truly matter. Lieberman&#8217;s subcommittee was the one responsible for global warming legislation.</p>
<p>And the legislation he drafted last year was <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/mccains-incoherence-global-warming-reaches-new-heights">insufficient to the challenge</a>, yet it became the main global warming bill.</p>
<p>Now, he will not play a critical role in drafting global warming legislation. That&#8217;s a pretty big deal.</p>
<p></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/its-not-about-lieberman-its-about-60/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Democrats allow Lieberman to go unpunished: We ?feel good about what we did today.?</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/senate-democrats-allow-lieberman-to-go-unpunished-we-feel-good-about-what-we-did-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/senate-democrats-allow-lieberman-to-go-unpunished-we-feel-good-about-what-we-did-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/senate-democrats-allow-lieberman-to-go-unpunished-we-feel-good-about-what-we-did-today/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Democrats allow Lieberman to go unpunished: We ?feel good about what we did today.? 		Today in a closed-door meeting, Senate Democrats voted 42-13 to allow Joe Lieberman (I-CT) to keep his chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, despite his attacks on Barack Obama during the campaign season. Shortly afterward, Senate Democrats held a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/reid-lieberman-vote/ 		" >Senate Democrats allow Lieberman to go unpunished: We ?feel good about what we did today.? 		</a><br />Today in a closed-door meeting, Senate Democrats voted 42-13 to allow Joe Lieberman (I-CT) to keep his chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, despite his attacks on Barack Obama during the campaign season. Shortly afterward, Senate Democrats held a press conference during which they stood by Lieberman and surrounded him with their support. Some [&#8230;]
<p>Today in a closed-door meeting, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/congress/34667644.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aU7EaDiaMDCiUZ">Senate Democrats voted 42-13</a> to allow Joe Lieberman (I-CT) to keep his chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, despite his <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/04/14/lieberman-its-a-good-question-to-ask-if-obama-is-a-marxist/">attacks on Barack Obama</a> during the campaign season. Shortly afterward, Senate Democrats held a press conference during which they stood by Lieberman and surrounded him with their support. Some highlights of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid&#8217;s (D-NV) remarks: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8211; &#8220;We&#8217;re looking forward, we&#8217;re not looking back.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; &#8220;I understand anger. &#8230; I would defy anyone to be angrier than I was. But is this a time when we walk out of here and say, &#8216;Boy, did we get even?&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; &#8220;I am satisfied with what we did today. I feel good about what we did today. I don&#8217;t apologize to anyone for what we did today.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; &#8220;The question is, do I trust Senator Lieberman? The answer is yes, I trust Senator Lieberman.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Watch the press conference: <center><object width="320" height="260">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ai5XUSc-W4U&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ai5XUSc-W4U&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="260"></embed></object></center></p>
<div id="viewBox-p32506"></div>
<p></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/senate-democrats-allow-lieberman-to-go-unpunished-we-feel-good-about-what-we-did-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Naming National Security Team Will Be a Priority for Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/naming-national-security-team-will-be-a-priority-for-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/naming-national-security-team-will-be-a-priority-for-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/naming-national-security-team-will-be-a-priority-for-obama/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Naming National Security Team Will Be a Priority for Obama If President-elect Barack Obama follows the pattern of most of his modern predecessors, one of the first documents to bear his signature after he takes office will be a directive laying out his administration&#8217;s national security structure. Bill Clinton signed one his first day [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/politics/index_xml/~3/NUxH0cZVpNA/AR2008111803422.html" > Naming National Security Team Will Be a Priority for Obama </a><br />If President-elect Barack Obama follows the pattern of most of his modern predecessors, one of the first documents to bear his signature after he takes office will be a directive laying out his administration&#8217;s national security structure. Bill Clinton signed one his first day in office; George W&#8230;.
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/B0vxvpBUH0wCxc1OuPmVp0v2OS0/a"><img src="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/B0vxvpBUH0wCxc1OuPmVp0v2OS0/i" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/politics/index_xml/~4/NUxH0cZVpNA" height="1" width="1"/></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/naming-national-security-team-will-be-a-priority-for-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Closing Guantanamo Will Heal Our Soul</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/closing-guantanamo-will-heal-our-soul/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/closing-guantanamo-will-heal-our-soul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/closing-guantanamo-will-heal-our-soul/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Closing Guantanamo Will Heal Our Soul          WASHINGTON &#8212; &#8220;I have said repeatedly that I intend to close Guantanamo, and I will follow through on that. I have said repeatedly that America does not torture, and I&#8217;m going to make sure that we don&#8217;t torture. Those are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/11/closing_guantanamo_will_heal_o.html          " >Closing Guantanamo Will Heal Our Soul          </a><br />WASHINGTON &#8212; &#8220;I have said repeatedly that I intend to close Guantanamo, and I will follow through on that. I have said repeatedly that America does not torture, and I&#8217;m going to make sure that we don&#8217;t torture. Those are part and parcel of an effort to regain America&#8217;s moral stature in the world.&#8221;       That unequivocal passage from President-elect Barack Obama&#8217;s first extended interview since the election, broadcast on &#8220;60 Minutes&#8221; Sunday night, was a big step toward healing the damage that the Bush administration has done not just to our nation&#8217;s image, but to its soul.
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Realclearpolitics-Articles?a=9WdEdU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Realclearpolitics-Articles?i=9WdEdU" border="0"></img></a></p>
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/11/the_clinton_considerations.html          " >The Clinton Considerations          </a><br />President-elect Obama is considering appointing Sen. Hillary Clinton to be his Secretary of State.  Henry Kissinger, who was Richard Nixon&#8217;s Secretary of State, thinks this would be a good idea:  &#8220;I believe it would be an outstanding appointment,&#8221; Mr. Kissinger said when asked about the rumor at the World Economic Forum in India over the weekend.  &#8220;If it is true, it shows a number of things, including great courage on the part of the President-Elect.  &#8220;To appoint a very strong personality into a prominent cabinet position requires a great deal of courage.&#8221; (Henry should know.)
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Realclearpolitics-Articles?a=W1CNL1"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Realclearpolitics-Articles?i=W1CNL1" border="0"></img></a></p>
<p></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/19/closing-guantanamo-will-heal-our-soul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ain’t No Marijuana</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/ain%e2%80%99t-no-marijuana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/ain%e2%80%99t-no-marijuana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/ain%e2%80%99t-no-marijuana/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ain’t No Marijuana 		&#8220;Enough!&#8221;, You must cry. We will no longer engage in a dialogue about something that does not exist. The word Marijuana exists for the sole purpose of eliciting fear.

  
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2008/11/17/aint-no-marijuana/ 		" >Ain’t No Marijuana 		</a><br />&#8220;Enough!&#8221;, You must cry. We will no longer engage in a dialogue about something that does not exist. The word Marijuana exists for the sole purpose of eliciting fear.
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/bartcop/vWnb?a=fqNgJv"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/bartcop/vWnb?i=fqNgJv" border="0"></img></a></p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bartcop/vWnb?a=VcrlN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bartcop/vWnb?i=VcrlN" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/ain%e2%80%99t-no-marijuana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Does Clinton Want?</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/what-does-clinton-want/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/what-does-clinton-want/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/what-does-clinton-want/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Does Clinton Want?             Speaking in Kuwait yesterday, Bill Clinton sounds like he wants his wife, Sen. Hillary Clinton, to become the next Secretary of State in the Obama administration. 
He claims not to know much about the discussions, but adds, &#8220;If I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/YxdiwlQEDDE/what_does_clinton_want.html             " >What Does Clinton Want?             </a><br />Speaking in Kuwait yesterday, Bill Clinton sounds like he wants his wife, Sen. Hillary Clinton, to become the next Secretary of State in the Obama administration. </p>
<p>He claims not to know much about the discussions, but adds, &#8220;If I did, I wouldn&#8217;t tell you.&#8221;</p>
<p>  <embed src="http://services.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/1272014141" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://services.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&amp;servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&amp;cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&amp;autoStart=false&amp;playerId=1272014141&amp;domain=embed" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swliveconnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" height="290" width="320"></p>
<p>  Meanwhile, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.politico.com/playbook/1108/playbook496.html">Mike Allen</a> reports that the Obama team, &#8220;after all but offering SecState to Senator Clinton, is expressing EXASPERATION with the Clinton camp for the difficulty in getting a clean vet on President Bill Clinton&#8217;s many entanglements.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1108/Exasperation.html?showall">Ben Smith</a> says sources tell him that Sen. Clinton herself is conflicted about taking the job.
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/UYcbQD_jYGPbkbwaw1Eq1vAUaRI/a"><img src="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/UYcbQD_jYGPbkbwaw1Eq1vAUaRI/i" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/YxdiwlQEDDE" height="1" width="1"/>             </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/what-does-clinton-want/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Late Late Nite FDL: T-Minus 36 Hours On The Lieber-watch</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/late-late-nite-fdl-t-minus-36-hours-on-the-lieber-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/late-late-nite-fdl-t-minus-36-hours-on-the-lieber-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/late-late-nite-fdl-t-minus-36-hours-on-the-lieber-watch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late Late Nite FDL: T-Minus 36 Hours On The Lieber-watch 		This is it Democrats, the final day for all of us to stand up on behalf of our party and remind our senators of the change we just ordered. Action tips and a song by the legenary Ska artist, Prince Buster, below the fold.





Ska legend, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/16/late-late-nite-fdl-t-minus-36-hours-on-the-lieber-watch/ 		" >Late Late Nite FDL: T-Minus 36 Hours On The Lieber-watch 		</a><br />This is it Democrats, the final day for all of us to stand up on behalf of our party and remind our senators of the change we just ordered. Action tips and a song by the legenary Ska artist, Prince Buster, below the fold.
<div class='hitEmbed_none'><object width="375" height="304">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/N0XtXyykNjo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/N0XtXyykNjo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="375" height="304"></embed></object></div>
</p>
<p>Ska legend,<strong><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.myspace.com/princebuster00"> Prince Buster</a> &#8220;Barrister Pardon&#8221; </strong></p>
<p>This is it Democrats, the final day for all of us to stand up on behalf of our party and remind our senators of the change we just ordered. Joe Lieberman fought change with every tool in his box. It&#8217;s time we ratchet up our voice of encouragement.</p>
<p> Here&#8217;s how.</p>
<p>Join over 30,000 others and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://action.firedoglake.com/page/petition/nomorejoe">sign the <strong><em>Say No to Joe</em></strong> letter</a>, which will be online until Tuesday morning.</p>
<p>       Call your senators and call members of the Steering and Outreach Committee listed below:</p>
<p>Debbie Stabenow, Michigan - Chairwoman (202) 224-4822<br />              Harry Reid, Nevada (202) 224-3542<br />              John Kerry, Massachusetts (202) 224-2742<br />              Daniel Inouye, Hawaii (202) 224-3934<br />              Robert Byrd, West Virginia (202) 224-3954<br />              Edward Kennedy, Massachusetts (202) 224-4543<br />              Joe Biden, Delaware (202) 224-5042<br />              Patrick Leahy, Vermont (202) 224-4242<br />              Chris Dodd, Connecticut (202) 224-2823<br />              Tom Harkin, Iowa (202) 224-3254<br />              Max Baucus, Montana (202) 224-2651<br />              Richard Durbin, Illinois (202) 224-2152<br />              Kent Conrad, North Dakota (202) 224-2043<br />              Carl Levin, Michigan (202) 224-6221<br />              Herbert Kohl, Wisconsin (202) 224-5653<br />              Barbara Boxer, California (202) 224-3553<br />              Hillary Clinton, New York (202) 224-4451<br />              Jeff Bingaman, New Mexico (202) 224-5521<br />              Mark Pryor, Arkansas (202) 224-2353</p>
<p>Let the committee members know your letter will be delivered on Tuesday. </p>
<p>Send this information to anyone who wants a party with a touch of integrity behind their promise of change.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s on your mind tonight?</p>
<p></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/late-late-nite-fdl-t-minus-36-hours-on-the-lieber-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Priority #1 for Working America &#8212; Make It Easier to Unionize</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/priority-1-for-working-america-make-it-easier-to-unionize/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/priority-1-for-working-america-make-it-easier-to-unionize/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/priority-1-for-working-america-make-it-easier-to-unionize/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Priority #1 for Working America &#8212; Make It Easier to Unionize 		Huge union campaign will hopefully counterbalance &#8220;corporate power and reverse the decline of the middle class.&#8221; 		]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.alternet.org/workplace/107476/priority_#1_for_working_america_--_make_it_easier_to_unionize/ 		" >Priority #1 for Working America &#8212; Make It Easier to Unionize 		</a><br />Huge union campaign will hopefully counterbalance &#8220;corporate power and reverse the decline of the middle class.&#8221; 		</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/priority-1-for-working-america-make-it-easier-to-unionize/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Lieberman Ally: He Needs To Face &#8220;Consequences&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/top-lieberman-ally-he-needs-to-face-consequences/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/top-lieberman-ally-he-needs-to-face-consequences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/top-lieberman-ally-he-needs-to-face-consequences/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Top Lieberman Ally: He Needs To Face &#8220;Consequences&#8221;    Now even one of Joe Lieberman&#8217;s leading Senate allies appears to be turning on him: Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), a close ally of Sen. Joe Lieberman, said the Connecticut Independent should pay a price for his campaign attacks against President-elect&#8230;    ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tpmelectioncentral/~3/LeLlhFubRa0/top_lieberman_ally_he_needs_to.php    " >Top Lieberman Ally: He Needs To Face &#8220;Consequences&#8221;    </a><br />Now even one of Joe Lieberman&#8217;s leading Senate allies appears to be turning on him: Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), a close ally of Sen. Joe Lieberman, said the Connecticut Independent should pay a price for his campaign attacks against President-elect&#8230;    </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/top-lieberman-ally-he-needs-to-face-consequences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confessore in the Times &#8230; Four Spitzer administration</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/confessore-in-the-times-four-spitzer-administration-8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/confessore-in-the-times-four-spitzer-administration-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/confessore-in-the-times-four-spitzer-administration-8/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Confessore in the Times &#8230; Four Spitzer administration officials violated the state&#8217;s ethics law when they used the State Police last summer to gather travel documents they hoped would tarnish Joseph L. Bruno, then the State Senate majority leader, according&#8230; ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Talking-Points-Memo/~3/345368190/205591.php " > </a><br />Confessore in the Times &#8230; Four Spitzer administration officials violated the state&#8217;s ethics law when they used the State Police last summer to gather travel documents they hoped would tarnish Joseph L. Bruno, then the State Senate majority leader, according&#8230; </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/confessore-in-the-times-four-spitzer-administration-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Focus on the Family forced to make layoffs after spending $600,000 to defeat marriage equality.</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/focus-on-the-family-forced-to-make-layoffs-after-spending-600000-to-defeat-marriage-equality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/focus-on-the-family-forced-to-make-layoffs-after-spending-600000-to-defeat-marriage-equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/focus-on-the-family-forced-to-make-layoffs-after-spending-600000-to-defeat-marriage-equality/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Focus on the Family forced to make layoffs after spending $600,000 to defeat marriage equality. 		Colorado Independent reports that Focus on the Family &#8220;is poised to announce major layoffs to its Colorado Springs-based ministry and media empire today.&#8221; The layoffs come after the right-wing group spent more than $600,000 to defeat marriage equality in California. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/17/dobson-layoffs/ 		" >Focus on the Family forced to make layoffs after spending $600,000 to defeat marriage equality. 		</a><br />Colorado Independent reports that Focus on the Family &#8220;is poised to announce major layoffs to its Colorado Springs-based ministry and media empire today.&#8221; The layoffs come after the right-wing group spent more than $600,000 to defeat marriage equality in California. Praising the passage of Prop. 8, the group said that the measure “helps protect millions [&#8230;]
<p>Colorado Independent reports that Focus on the Family &#8220;is poised to announce major layoffs to its Colorado Springs-based ministry and media empire today.&#8221; The layoffs come after the right-wing group <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://coloradoindependent.com/15287/after-pumping-money-into-prop-8-focus-on-the-family-announcing-layoffs">spent more than $600,000 to defeat marriage equality</a> in California. Praising the passage of Prop. 8, the group said that the measure “helps protect millions of children from <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/11/james-dobsons-f.html">radical indoctrination in the homosexual lifestyle</a>.&#8221; The group also touted its involvement collecting signatures and gathering donations, patting itself on the back for being &#8220;integrally involved&#8221; in the fight against marriage equality.</p>
<div id="viewBox-p32460"></div>
<p></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/focus-on-the-family-forced-to-make-layoffs-after-spending-600000-to-defeat-marriage-equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Ayers Delivers Two Speeches in Washington</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/bill-ayers-delivers-two-speeches-in-washington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/bill-ayers-delivers-two-speeches-in-washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/bill-ayers-delivers-two-speeches-in-washington/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Bill Ayers Delivers Two Speeches in Washington William Ayers, the Weather Underground founder, popped up in Washington yesterday from his self-imposed no-publicity, no-comment underground and looked like he was loving the sunshine.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/politics/index_xml/~3/olSQzJ0pQ6s/AR2008111800007.html" > Bill Ayers Delivers Two Speeches in Washington </a><br />William Ayers, the Weather Underground founder, popped up in Washington yesterday from his self-imposed no-publicity, no-comment underground and looked like he was loving the sunshine.
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/xNvgexBm5bD8G48qdfFFeN1S8AM/a"><img src="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/xNvgexBm5bD8G48qdfFFeN1S8AM/i" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/politics/index_xml/~4/olSQzJ0pQ6s" height="1" width="1"/></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/bill-ayers-delivers-two-speeches-in-washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Bail Out General Motors</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/how-to-bail-out-general-motors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/how-to-bail-out-general-motors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Blog (All Posts)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/how-to-bail-out-general-motors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to Bail Out General Motors          WASHINGTON &#8212; So it&#8217;s come to this: General Motors, once the world&#8217;s mightiest industrial enterprise, is now flirting with bankruptcy. Ford and Chrysler may not be far behind. Car and truck sales have collapsed. With cash reserves rapidly falling, GM [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/11/how_to_bail_out_general_motors.html          " >How to Bail Out General Motors          </a><br />WASHINGTON &#8212; So it&#8217;s come to this: General Motors, once the world&#8217;s mightiest industrial enterprise, is now flirting with bankruptcy. Ford and Chrysler may not be far behind. Car and truck sales have collapsed. With cash reserves rapidly falling, GM may soon be unable to pay its bills. Here&#8217;s the dilemma. GM and other U.S. automakers ought to be rescued to minimize damage to the economy; but the rescue should require tough conditions that neither the Democratic Congress nor the incoming Obama administration yet supports.       In a booming economy, a GM bankruptcy might be tolerable and useful. It would remind everyone of the social costs of mediocre management and overpriced unionized labor. But far from booming, the economy is declining at an apparently accelerating rate. By one survey, confidence among small businesses is at a 28-year low; in October retail sales dropped a stunning 2.8 percent.
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Realclearpolitics-Articles?a=tqHc6r"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Realclearpolitics-Articles?i=tqHc6r" border="0"></img></a></p>
<p></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2008/11/18/how-to-bail-out-general-motors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
