We are the Liberal Blog From Hollywood
L.A.'s Premier Post Facility

L.A.'s Premier Post Facility

Photographer in L.A.

Hot Pics & Gossip.

Archive for February 24th, 2009

Penn May Take On Plame ‘Game’

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on February 24th, 2009 5:42 am by HL

Penn May Take On Plame ‘Game’

Wilson and Penn

Here’s a melding of celebrity and politics that might just be a natural: Academy Award™-winning actor and sometime international political analyst Sean Penn is in talks to play former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, husband of outed CIA agent Valerie Plame, in director Doug Liman’s dramatic retelling of Plame’s story, currently known in deal-making circles as “Fair Game.”

READ THE WHOLE ITEM

Related Entries


Eric Margolis: How Obama Can Further U.S.-Iran Relations

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on February 24th, 2009 5:40 am by HL

Eric Margolis: How Obama Can Further U.S.-Iran Relations
Eric S. Margolis Special for the Huffington Post February 23, 2009 Paris – Iran is celebrating the 30th anniversary of its historic 1979 Islamic revolution,…

Cenk Uygur: Let’s Talk About Race, Baby!
Last week, Baratunde Thurston and I appeared on MSNBC together to talk about the infamous NY Post chimp cartoon. Since then, we have been having…

Christina Bellantoni: Clooney gets White House Darfur promise
I caught George Clooney tonight after a very long day at the White House as he emerged from a meeting with Vice President Biden…

EyesandEars: Home Owner Protests Foreclosure in Queens, NY
This story was reported and written by Lauren Cannon. She is one of the HuffPost citizen journalists helping cover the on the ground effects of…

EyesandEars: Home Owner Protests Foreclosure in Houston, TX
This story was reported and written by Leia Ford. She is one of the HuffPost citizen journalists helping cover the on the ground effects of…


Boehlert: Unhinged in 30 days: The right-wing media’s Obama era implosion

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on February 24th, 2009 5:40 am by HL

Boehlert: Unhinged in 30 days: The right-wing media’s Obama era implosion

The Republican Noise Machine doesn’t need the customary 100 days to size up the new president. Right-wing commentators barely needed 30 days to come to their conclusion that they hate everything Barack Obama stands for.

In terms of speed and efficiency, the right-wing collection of bloggers, AM talkers, pundits, and yes, newspaper cartoonists, may have set a new land speed record for becoming collectively unhinged, as they wail and moan about how the new Democratic president’s turning America into a fascist state, or communist, or socialist, or whatever other bugaboo claim Glenn Beck and Laura Ingraham are tossing out to viewers and listeners on a daily basis.

Barack Obama is “arrogant,” “dishonest,” and “radical,” Fox News’ Sean Hannity announced during a single 10-second chunk of prime-time TV last week — a casually hateful appraisal that didn’t even raise eyebrows, simply because that kind of blanketed disdain for the new president has already become so commonplace.

Rush Limbaugh’s original anti-Obama proclamation at the outset of his presidency — “I hope he fails” — already seems benign in retrospect. Since Inauguration Day we’ve learned Obama has “Marxist tendencies” and is “addicting this country to heroin — the heroin that is government slavery” (Glenn Beck). That, “there are eerie, eerie similarities” between Obama and Nazis” (Michael Savage’s guest host, Chris Stigall). And of course, Limbaugh himself famously bemoaned that “[w]e are being told that we have to hope [Obama] succeeds, that we have to bend over, grab the ankles … because his father was black.”

Meanwhile, last week widely read right-wing blogger Michelle Malkin was seen smiling while getting her picture taken with an Obama hater who proudly brandished a swastika placard at an anti-Obama rally in Denver. And the following day, Rupert Murdoch’s far-right New York Post published a grotesque cartoon that seemed to associate Obama with a bullet-ridden monkey who’d been shot by two white cops on a city sidewalk.

If we just pause and take one or two steps back from the daily/hourly barrage of hate, it’s obvious that faced with the new Obama presidency, the Republican Noise Machine has already lost all perspective — has gone totally loco — and it’s only February, a mere month into Obama’s first four years in office. Who dares to even imagine where the right-wing “conversation” goes from here?

It’s astounding to watch the avalanche of hate ooze from conservative media quarters. And why? Because Obama passed an economic recovery bill. Good Lord, imagine if he had failed to win the popular vote and then led the country into a pre-emptive war based on faulty intelligence, a war that lost thousands of American lives, and tens of thousands of foreign lives, while milking the U.S. treasury out of a few trillion dollars in the process.

I suspect the unvarnished hate directed toward Obama, the radical rhetoric behind it, and most especially the overnight delivery used to proclaim it, is unprecedented for our modern politics. Even during the first Clinton weeks and months in 1993, I don’t think the right-wing ratcheted up the demonizing language this quickly. Note that back then the Republican Noise Machine was just coming into its own, whereas today it’s a well-oiled hate machine. Also, in the early 1990s, the Noise Machine (i.e., Limbaugh) hadn’t been given unofficial control of Republican Party messaging the way it has today. There still seemed to be some (emphasis on some) adult supervision within conservative circles.

But today, by openly embracing Limbaugh, leader-less conservatives are purposefully mainstreaming the talkers’ brand of loonyness. And by enthusiastically endorsing Limbaugh and his crowd, Republicans must accept — must take ownership of — the radical hate speech that defines the Noise Machine. The way Limbaugh, already under Obama, has compared Democrats to murderers, rapists, and Satan. The way Limbaugh recently tagged them as “immoral” people who are “not truly religious” and who are waging an “assault” on the Constitution, while claiming Democrats hate life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. (And Beltway journalists naïvely scratch their heads wondering why Obama cannot achieve bipartisanship.)

That hate speech is now, unequivocally, the sanctioned voice of the Republican Party. It’s a voice that, after just 30 days of an Obama presidency, has gone completely bonkers. And it’s a voice that’s revealed itself in the form of swastikas, dead monkeys, and bizarre talk of ankle-grabbing.

But liberals hated Bush! That’s the but-they-did-it-too defense being paraded around by right-wingers like Malkin after she was spotted with Swastika Guy. Everybody on the left compared Bush to Hitler, Malkin claimed last week. Really? Liberal protesters waved around Bush-Hitler signs at rallies to protest new administration policy during Bush’s first month in office? Bush hadn’t even finished filling out his Cabinet, and prominent liberals were demonizing the new president as an anti-American fascist?

Please.

Malkin’s lame stab at revisionism was simply an attempt to justify the right’s radical attacks on Obama. Were there widespread, hysterical Hitler references to Bush 30 days after he took office? Not that I recall. And in the wake of Bush’s tax cuts being passed by Congress in 2001, did any major newspapers publish cartoons that seemed to connect Bush with a bullet-ridden monkey? No. And if there had been such a tasteless cartoon, would a single high-profile liberal commenter have possibly defended it? I can’t imagine one who would have.

Some on the right adopted the same, childish two-wrongs-make-a-right defense in reaction to that hateful New York Post cartoon. But the left hated Bush more, wrote conservative blogger (and Post apologist) John Hinderaker at Power Line. Note the time frame he uses:

Democrats will no doubt continue to use Obama’s race to try to silence criticism, but they can rest assured that conservatives will never unleash the kind of mindless hate against Obama (or anyone else) that we have all witnessed from the Left over the past six years.

Six years. Meaning, there was very little outlandish Bush hate broadcast from the left for approximately the Republicans’ first 24 months in office. Let alone his first 30 days. (What kind of political movement melts down 30 days into a new administration?) In fact, during the summer of 2001, The Washington Post‘s Sally Quinn went on TV and talked about how suddenly calm and rational Beltway partisan differences were, as opposed to those chaotic Clinton years:

I don’t think [Bush has] changed the city at all, but I think what has happened is that he has allowed the city to get back to normal. It has not been normal for eight years. For eight years it’s been really ugly and vicious and personal, and what’s happened now is that this is — that the adversary situation is back to normal.

See the trend? When a Democrat was in the White House, the atmosphere was “ugly and vicious and personal.” When a Republican took over, everything went back to “normal.” And now with the return of another Democrat, the right-wing hate returns in full bloom. And in record time.

Secondly, Malkin tried to claim that everyone on the left used the Hitler/Nazi language, and to prove her point she did lots of Googling and posted links to sites that contained that kind of language or imagery. But one was a photo of anti-Bush graffiti from Argentina, circa 2006. What that had to do with Malkin’s claim about American liberals, I’m still not sure. And many of the links Malkin posted led to sites I’ve never heard of.

She did link to the landmark site Daily Kos, and a search there found lots of dumb, regrettable Bush/Hitler references. But most of those were from 2006 and 2007, 60 months after Bush had been in office, and most were by Daily Kos readers, or diarists, not front-page writers. You’ll note that in her liberals-did-it-too defense Malkin didn’t link to images of Markos at Daily Kos with his arms around a Bush-era swastika protester, or Matt Stoller or John Amato or Jeralyn Merritt — or fill in the blank with any other A-list blogger you’d like to mention. Even after eight years of despair (i.e. botched war, trampled civil liberties, mass incompetence), most prominent liberal bloggers never went there with the Bush-Hitler nonsense.

But Malkin, among the most widely read bloggers in the conservative movement, and just four weeks into the new Democratic presidency’s run? Hell yeah, she’ll pose with an Obama hater waving around a swastika sign, and then refuse to apologize, claiming the Nazi/Obama analogy was not “completely out of the bounds of public civil discourse.” Because honestly, who knows more about the guidelines of “public civil discourse” than Michelle Malkin?

The Republican Noise Machine, which has already turned its hate amplifiers up to 10, doesn’t like to admit it, but over time a strong majority of Americans came to share the liberals’ contempt for Bush, who they dubbed to be an utter failure as a president. And perhaps the worst in the nation’s history. The Obama disdain, though, is being unleashed against a president with extraordinarily high job approval ratings, which highlights how the Noise Machine remains completely out of touch with mainstream America.

As that fact becomes increasingly obvious in the months to come, I fear it’s only going to force feverish conservatives to ratchet up the hate.

Maybe they’ll turn it up to 11.

FYI: Here were some other signs spotted at the anti-Obama Denver rally that Malkin attended, signs that perfectly captured — and regurgitated — the hateful talking points the Noise Machine has been churning out since Obama’s inauguration just one month ago:


Won’t Get Fooled Again

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on February 24th, 2009 5:38 am by HL

Won’t Get Fooled Again
WASHINGTON — It’s reaching the point where desperate measures — brutal honesty and complete transparency — may be the only way to bring the economy out of its kamikaze dive. If so, this won’t be pretty. A certain amount of legerdemain is designed into the financial system and makes everyone richer. But those we trusted with the world’s money are being shown to have acted with such cupidity, irresponsibility and incompetence that a consensus seems to be forming around the cautionary words of George W. Bush, our greatest unintentional aphorist: “Fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can’t get fooled again.”


Quelle Surprise: Rove A No-Show, Again, For US Attorneys Testimony

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on February 24th, 2009 5:37 am by HL

Quelle Surprise: Rove A No-Show, Again, For US Attorneys Testimony
So today was the day that Karl Rove was supposed to appear before the House Judiciary committee to testify about the US Attorney firings. And of course, Rove didn’t show. That wasn’t a surprise. After getting the deadline pushed back,…

Five-Star Dining, Stanford Style!
“It’s not often that an owner sets an unlimited budget for creating a tabletop. The Pavilion in Antigua is that rare situation.” That’s from a 2004 “Tabletop Performance Special Mention” — which seems to be some kind award for setting…

Stanford: How I Avoided Sub-Prime Debacle
You’ve probably seen or read about the interview from last year in which Allen Stanford tells a sycophantic CNBC talking head that “it is fun being a billionaire”. But that same interview also features Stanford boasting — with the interviewer’s…


House Will Vote on Earmark Probe

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on February 24th, 2009 5:35 am by HL

House Will Vote on Earmark Probe
“As lawmakers prepare to consider a $410 billion spending bill carrying pet projects for clients of a lobbying firm under FBI investigation, the House will vote as early as Tuesday on whether to start an ethics investigation into the relationship between earmarks and campaign contributions,” CQ Politico reports.

“The vote could put majority Democrats and at least a few Republicans in an uncomfortable spot. They will have to choose between authorizing the House ethics committee to investigate the most delicate of political relationships or publicly voting against such a probe.”


Wall Street Sharks Have Lost Everything, and Now They’re Coming After Us

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on February 24th, 2009 5:34 am by HL

Wall Street Sharks Have Lost Everything, and Now They’re Coming After Us
Gutting Social Security and Medicare to pay for the sins of Wall Street is a perverse idea.

The Spectacular, Sudden Crash of the Global Economy
In a short period of months, the entire system of global capitalism has screeched to a halt. No one knows what happens next.

The Most Influential (and Self-Promotional) Christian Zionist You’ve Never Heard Of
Jimmy Carter-hating Mike Evans claims: "You can save American lives by helping me get on the major networks."


Dennis Ross A Fair Trade for Chas Freeman

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on February 24th, 2009 5:33 am by HL

Dennis Ross A Fair Trade for Chas Freeman
Tonight, State Department Acting Spokesman Robert Wood issued a statement that Dennis Ross was now officially “Special Advisor for The Gulf and Southwest Asia.” This is amazing news given early world and rumor from quite solid sources that Ambassador Ross,…





Fiscal Responsibility: The Peter G. Peterson Intergenerational Fairness Tax Credit
Peter Peterson is out to get your Social Security and Medicare. For those who don’t know him, Peterson has long been in the public limelight. He was the Commerce Secretary in the Nixon administration. He then went on to make…

Has The Jewish Community Finally Woken Up?
The other day I was asked if the existence of Israel Policy Forum “really make a difference.” My interlocutor went on: “I would not expect you to have ended the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. That is not something Americans can do. But…


Sanford Offers Unemployed South Carolina Resident ?Prayers? Instead Of Stimulus Funds

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on February 24th, 2009 5:32 am by HL

Sanford Offers Unemployed South Carolina Resident ?Prayers? Instead Of Stimulus Funds
Following the lead of a number of his fellow Republican governors, Gov. Mark Sanford (R-SC) has given some indication that he will not accept some of the money slated for South Carolina in the $787 billion economic recovery bill President Obama signed into law last week. “At times it sounds like the Soviet grain quotas […]

Following the lead of a number of his fellow Republican governors, Gov. Mark Sanford (R-SC) has given some indication that he will not accept some of the money slated for South Carolina in the $787 billion economic recovery bill President Obama signed into law last week. “At times it sounds like the Soviet grain quotas of Stalin’s time,” Sanford said yesterday on Fox News.

On C-SPAN’s Washington Journal this morning, Sanford received a call from a Charleston resident who said he lost his job because he has been taking care of mother and sister, both of whom have serious illnesses. The caller told Sanford he is “wrong” to decline the money. “A lot of people in South Carolina are hurting. And if this money can come and help us out we need it.” In response, Sanford could offer him only his prayers:

CALLER: I hope you all are not playing politics with this. People in South Carolina are hurting. You know how unemployment rates are high right now and going up higher. We are running out of money in the unemployment bank — we need money for that, the people that need help. And I’m one of them, I can’t get no help. […]

SANFORD: Well I’d say hello to Charleston because its home and I’d say hello to this fellow this morning and say that my prayers are going to be with him and his family because it sounds like he is in an awfully tough spot.

Watch it:

Sanford offered no other alternative solution for his constituent and instead argued that the state could not accept money to extend unemployment benefits because “increasing the tax on unemployment insurance” would negatively “impact the caller’s family” (although he didn’t say how).

Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC) — who sponsored an amendment to the stimulus bill that would allow state legislatures to “accept stimulus funding over the objections of conservative governors” — chastised Sanford on MSNBC this morning. “This program is an opportunity for Governor Sanford to target” the “chronically unemployed” and “chronically sick” communities in South Carolina. “I have got to believe that he is willing…to help these communities,” Clyburn said, asking,”Why won’t he?”

Bunning misspells Justice Ginsburg?s name in his apology statement.
Over the weekend, Sen. Jim Bunning (R-KY) predicted that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg would be dead within “nine months” from pancreatic cancer. First Read reports that Bunning has now put out a statement apologizing for the remarks, although his office misspells the Justice’s name: “I apologize if my comments offended Justice Ginsberg,” Bunning […]

Over the weekend, Sen. Jim Bunning (R-KY) predicted that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg would be dead within “nine months” from pancreatic cancer. First Read reports that Bunning has now put out a statement apologizing for the remarks, although his office misspells the Justice’s name:

I apologize if my comments offended Justice Ginsberg,” Bunning said. “That certainly was not my intent. It is great to see her back at the Supreme Court today and I hope she recovers quickly. My thoughts and prayers are with her and her family.”


Health Care Tops Fiscal Need List

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on February 24th, 2009 5:31 am by HL

Health Care Tops Fiscal Need List
President Obama will make reforming the U.S. health-care system his top fiscal priority this year, administration officials said yesterday, contending that reining in skyrocketing medical costs is critical to saving the nation from bankruptcy.

Obama’s Job Approval Ratings High, but Poll Finds Bipartisan Support Eroding
As President Obama prepares to address a joint session of Congress tonight, he is receiving strong reviews for his first full month in office, but deep partisan fault lines are quickly reemerging.

U.S. May Set Greenhouse Gas Standard for Cars
The Obama administration is considering establishing national rules for regulating greenhouse gas emissions for automobiles, according to White House officials, a move backed by both auto manufacturers and some environmentalists.

Louisiana’s Jindal, Set to Give GOP Response to Obama, Took Fast Track to National Prominence
One Rhodes scholarship applicant stood out on the long roster of Louisiana’s high achievers: 20-year-old Bobby Jindal. He so impressed the state’s selection committee with his intelligence and eloquence that the judges hashed over the contenders for just 30 seconds before picking Jindal as a…

Obama Addresses the National Governors Association
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: First of all, thanks for not breaking anything last night. (LAUGHTER)