How Our Soldiers Feel About Iraq
Posted in H.L. News, Main Blog (All Posts) on April 24th, 2007 6:02 am by HL
This is from a letter to Craigslist, from a soldier whose live Bush has ruined along with oh so many. Of course most of our men and women in Iraq feel the same way
I’m having the worst damn week of my whole damn life so I’m going to write this while I’m pissed off enough to do it right.
I am SICK of all this bullshit people are writing about the Iraq war. I am abso-f***ing-lutely sick to death of it. What the f**k do most of you know about it? You watch it on TV and read the commentaries in the newspaper or Newsweek or whatever god damn yuppie news rag you subscribe to and think you’re all such f**ing experts that you can scream at each other like five year old about whether you’re right or not. Let me tell you something: unless you’ve been there, you don’t know a god damn thing about it. It you haven’t been shot at in that f**king hell hole, SHUT THE F**K UP!
How do I dare say this to you moronic war supporters who are “Supporting our Troops” and waving the flag and all that happy horse shit? I’ll tell you why. I’m a Marine and I served my tour in Iraq. My husband, also a Marine, served several. I left the service six months ago because I got pregnant while he was home on leave and three days ago I get a visit from two men in uniform who hand me a letter and tell me my husband died in that f**king festering sand-pit. He should have been home a month ago but they extended his tour and now he’s coming home in a box.
You f**kers and that god-damn lying sack of shit they call a president are the reason my husband will never see his baby and my kid will never meet his dad.
And you know what the most f**ked up thing about this Iraq shit is? They don’t want us there. They’re not happy we came and they want us out NOW. We f**ked up their lives even worse than they already were and they’re pissed off. We didn’t help them and we’re not helping them now. That’s what our soldiers are dying for.
Oh while I’m good and worked up, the government doesn’t even have the decency to help out the soldiers whos lives they ruined. If you really believe the military and the government had no idea the veterans’ hospitals were so f**ked up, you are a god-damn retard. They don’t care about us. We’re disposable. We’re numbers on a page and they’d rather forget we exist so they don’t have to be reminded about the families and lives they ruined while they’re sipping their cocktails at another fund raiser dinner. If they were really concerned about supporting the troops, they’d bring them home so their families wouldn’t have to cry at a graveside and explain to their children why mommy or daddy isn’t coming home. Because you can’t explain it. We’re not fighting for our country, we’re not fighting for the good of Iraq’s people, we’re fighting for Bush’s personal agenda. Patriotism my ass. You know what? My dad served in Vietnam and NOTHING HAS CHANGED.
So I’m pissed. I’m beyond pissed. And I’m going to go to my husband funeral and recieve that flag and hang it up on the wall for my baby to see when he’s older. But I’m not going to tell him that his father died for the stupidty of the American government. I’m going to tell him that his father was a hero and the best man I ever met and that he loved his country enough to die for it, because that’s all true and nothing will be solved by telling my son that his father was sent to die by people who didn’t care about him at all.
F**k you, war supporters, George W. Bush, and all the god damn mother f**kers who made the war possible. I hope you burn in hell.
April 24th, 2007 at 9:30 am
Whats this make HL about 6 people that you have found to back your idea of the war. I am sorry that she lost her husband that is part of war but to blame everyone that supported her while she was there is a cop out on her part. She wants everyone to feel sorry for her because of her lose and I am sorry but is she special no because she is not the only one that has lost someone. There are other familys in this country that have lost Husbands, Brothers, Wives, Sisters, and Grandfathers as well as people that lose those very same people in Iraq because of a group of people that think they should have control of the world. She has a right to blame who she wants but I will bet that if you ask everyone who has lost someone in a war the first thing they do is blame the war. And that is exactly what she is doing. If this war hadn’t been started than her husband waould still be here. If the towers hadn’t have been hit we wouldn’t have been there. If the USS Cole hadn’t been hit than we would have been there. The list can go on and on. It did happen and we are there and that is that. We aren’t going to leave until it is done and people have to deal with that. You can say that we are stealing this and that and we are killing these people and those but what it comes down to is that you have a group of people that are going to kill who ever and do what ever to get what they want and the US isn’t going to let them. You used the analogy of if it were the US. Well guess what the exact same thing happen in the US it was called the Revolution and that is what is going on today in Iraq. The problem is that people like you HL don’t care about other people you just care about yourself. You don’t care wether those people get their freedom as long as you keep yours. And you have that right but the majority of the people still belive in helping people obtain their freedoms that they want. And if you think that is a lie than look at the facts that I posted about people enlisting. The military is exceeding their enlistment goals and people know they will go to Iraq.
April 24th, 2007 at 9:32 am
By the way if she truly thought it was a bullshit war supporting a lie than she would have no problem telling her son that his dad was a hero that died fighting a war that was a lie.
April 24th, 2007 at 12:11 pm
“9 more soldiers killed thanks to Bush†So let me guess Mr Bush supplied the car bomb and trained the insurgents. So he must of also trained the terrorist that attacted the towers,and asked for our embassys to be attacted,and caused the attack on out merchant ships back in 1801
Fact of the matters is this crap has been going on for ages all in the name of islamic beliefs. and he must have also told Timithy Mc Vain to go and blow up OKC. and while we or at it lets blame him for the USS Cole being blowen up oh yah he must of also be responcable for the Iran hostage affair,we can also blame him for putting up the Berlin wall,we can blame him for the fall of the USSRand i bet you you that he payed Monica to give slicke Wille a Knobber job,he is also directly responcalbe for the Green House affect on both earth and mars and it was deffently his fault HL was concieved.
April 24th, 2007 at 12:20 pm
I have learned, in this life, that some people will never learn, never change, regardless of being shown all the facts, regardless of being given all the truth. People need to understand this. And if you do not think this is so, simply reread the unsympathetic strange response from this person to the grieving wife of the deceased Marine. Bill not only will not see reality, the facts, he won’t even let himself hear this woman’s sorrow or allow her her agony. What a world.
April 24th, 2007 at 12:55 pm
So the world now owes her a livin,Both bill and i are sorry for her, but the fact remains she is not alone. I too have lost family and some very good friends over there. So by your lodgic the whole damn country should feel sorry for me too or i can go on with my life and remember the person. you just don’t join the military and think that this will never happen i respect those who join, but they know the risk, just as i know the risks of my job, and how dangerous it can be. I have several freinds die doing this job.I worked the fishing boats up in alaska and see people get cut in half and throwin over board so please feel sorry for me. IF I MADE A CHOICE TO DO SOME JOB AND GET HURT THAN I EXPECT NO ONE TO FEEL SORRY FOR ME, BUT PLEASE DO I’M SAD
April 24th, 2007 at 1:08 pm
Q.E.D.
April 24th, 2007 at 3:24 pm
Douglas…to put it in language you may understand, what would Jesus think of what you just wrote? Is this what you bible beaters really think of your fellow humans? You should be ashamed.
April 24th, 2007 at 3:25 pm
what does Q.E.D. mean??
April 24th, 2007 at 4:18 pm
Anon so be cause she has a loss in her life we have to stop the world,. last time i had a loss like that i woke up the next morning and kept right on living oh i wanted to blame the world but guess what i just could not. What would Jesus do he would forgive just she will have to do and uder stand some things are out of our control. Death will come to us no matter where we are when it is our time to meet our maker it is our time. There is just no getting around it, being we die of cancer, a car accident if god calls us home than guess what we are going home. Death is not the end just another step in life. all we can do be ready. are you ? you blame Bush, will you forgive him?. I am not ashamed of my beliefs what so ever.
April 24th, 2007 at 9:08 pm
Well to start with anon jesus wouldn’t have her blaming everyone else for what her husband chose to do.
Quen.. As to your comment. That is about the biggest load of crap I have heard from a liberal yet. What you are saying is that this woman is the only one that is allowed to feel sorrow or agony for her lose. Please she is not the only person that has lost someone so you can cram your B.S. comment up your sorry worthless ass. You want me to feel sorry for her because she has lost her husband? I do and I said that but to sit there and blame Bush for it is pathetic because Bush is not the one that made her husband nor her enlist. Besides that if she sisn’t want to take the chance of one or the other dieing than neither of them should have joined the military. What is the main job of the military. Here is a clue. To fight for this country when the Commander and Cheif calls on you to do so.
Do I think that she is serious about her claim. NO because if she was than she would have no problem with telling her son that his dad was a hero and died in a war that was a lie. No one had a problem telling the men that fought in Vietnam that very same thing. So you think I am heartless that is fine but I am not going to sit here and listen to one woman bitch about the fact that her son has to grow up without his dad because he died in the war when there is nothing special about her or her son. She is not the only one that has lost family in this war and as to your comment “Bill not only will not see reality, the facts, he won’t even let himself hear this woman’s sorrow or allow her her agony” take your ass over and join the military before you start talking about me. I have lost family due to wars so you can kiss my ass about being unsympathetic. How bout you have you lost anyone because of this wara or any other. More than likly not from your comment so you can take your bleeding sorry ass back to the hole that it came from but before you do stop and thank a vet for your freedoms.
April 25th, 2007 at 11:41 am
Go Bill. First off, if that letter isnt a fake id be surprised, because i watched a Fox News special where Sean Hannity got off his ass and went over to Iraq to find out about how they felt. Not only did hundreds of soldiers over the course of the special say they wanted to be over there and believed in what they were doing, i didnt hear a single one say they blamed Bush for their trouble. This woman was just lashing out in grief, if she exists. Her husband, and her, chose to be over there.
“Of course most of our men and women in Iraq feel the same way,” you say. Would you like to use some legitimate sources other than one letter from Craigslist to support that? How about you hippies just go hug a tree and hope it falls over on you.
April 25th, 2007 at 7:08 pm
Douglas, Quen is trying to be educated or trying to show that it is somewhat educated. Q.E.D. “quod erat demonstrandum”. Nice I didn’t know liberals knew big words like that. Wait I guess Quen doesn’t because there were only the letters.
Oh and the definition for it in normal peoples language is “I’ve proven my point”.
Pretty sad when they don’t have the balls to just say it they got to try and be tricky.
April 25th, 2007 at 8:55 pm
Craig..
You were right.Read this from a Marine.
Date: 2007-04-25, 6:20PM PDT
These are the only three United States Marines killed in Iraq during the time frame the letter writer specified. As a female USMC Veteran I am calling bull pucky here. By the way MARINES NEVER REFER TO THEMSELVES AS SOLDIERS!
Staff Sgt. Marcus A. Golczynski, 30, of Lewisburg, Tenn., died March 27. Death release March 29th. this cant be her husband as she said she was notified Apri 7th. News release comes after notification of family. “The Tennessean’s April 5 photograph of young Christian Golczynski accepting the American flag from Marine Lt. Col. Ric Thompson is one of the most moving and emotion provoking images I have ever seen. †his funeral already happened. he cant be the guy, period end of story.
He is the son of Elaine Huffines of Lewisburg and Henry Golczynski of Murfreesboro. Fay and Henry Golczynski, owners of Franklin Printworks in Murfreesboro, received the news late Tuesday. Sgt. Golczynski had an 8-year-old son who lives with his mother in Maryland. During the service, Heather Golczynski said her husband had been her hero and their son’s hero and that he would be missed. “I find comfort from looking at Christian and seeing Marc reflected†in his son, she said. Sound like the tone of that letter
Pfc. Miguel A. Marcial III, 19, of Secaucus, N.J., died April 1 in Al Anbar province, Iraq. His death is currently under investigation. Date of news release April 3rd. ““He was only there a month. The whole thing is so shocking,†he said.†Cant be the guy the orginal poster said her husband was at the end of his tour and had been extended.
From the funeral announcement of PFC Miguel A. Marcial III: Miguel was the beloved son of Miguel Jr. and Dianna; loving brother of Michael and Raquel; dear grandson of German and Luz Baez, and stepson of Lisa Lopez. No grieving widow.
Lance Cpl. Daniel R. Olsen, 20, of Eagan, Minn., died April 2 while conducting combat operations in Al Anbar province, Iraq. Olsen was assigned to 2nd Battalion, 7th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division, I Marine Expeditionary Force, Twentynine Palms, Calif. Date of news release April 3rd. “He first was deployed on Jan. 28, 2007. His parents last spoke with him by telephone last weekend.†This guy was no where close to the end of his 7th month deployed. Not to mention the unit has not been extended.
L/Cpl Olsen: Survived by parents, Wayne & Gwen; sisters Shelcy & Shaina; and grandpa John Edstrom. Again no grieving widow.
The next date of Marine KIAs prior to the dates that post on Craigslist covered was March 22. I hardly think it took the USMC until April 7th to notify the next of kin.
I have no problem with anyone disagreeing with or even bashing the heck out of the Bush administration but I HATE WANNABES.
April 26th, 2007 at 1:07 pm
HL I would love to thank you for some thing for most of my life i have tried to stay nutral when it comes to politics you have real helped me to decide which side to take so from the bottom of my heart thank you very much i now know that i’m a republican
April 26th, 2007 at 7:10 pm
Welcome aboard Douglas! We are glad to have you.
H.L., yet another person driven away from the democrat party. I dont blame them do you? Come on over to the party that has it right. There is room for you H.L.! You can change if you try. Just tell yourself over and over again that you are not yellow. You want to be like Bush deep down inside. Your jealous of him. That is why your mad at him. You want to be like Bush but cant. Your stuck with a loosing cause. You need something to latch on to and it shows in the way you jump from candidate to candidate. “Im voting for Feigngold” “Im voting for Kucinich”!
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Buck out!!!
April 26th, 2007 at 7:41 pm
Hey Buck don’t forget he was going to vote for Hillary to at one time.
April 27th, 2007 at 7:49 am
Bill,
There you go again. I never said I was voting for Hilary. I did say that I will vote for whoever the democrats nominate. I did say I was voting for Feingold in the primaries, but he decided not to run. So I am now voting for Kucinich in the primaries, (and after the debate last night I have not changed my mind) I did say that Hilary would be a good President (and I thought she did pretty will in the debate) because she would have Bill helping her out. (You know, the best President we have had in our lifetimes)
April 27th, 2007 at 2:35 pm
If you said that you would vote for any one the dems out up there than if hilary gets it you’ll have to vote for the fall of the nation
April 27th, 2007 at 3:30 pm
Look H.L. I dont mean to bore you. Humor me a little. Do you doubt Clinton lost his nuke codes? That is a documented case of serious as it gets. How could he possibly have been the best president. Success is not measured by how many food stamps you can hand out. Jesus H. Christ! The president is the leader of the military. Militaries are militaristic. A president must be that way. If not he is a sucky president. Plain and simple. Loosing your nuke codes qualifies as a major fu*k up! You just want to fluff it off like it was nothing.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:43 pm
Doug,
“9 more soldiers killed thanks to Bush†So let me guess Mr Bush supplied the car bomb and trained the insurgents.”
No but he didn’t have too. Lets see if you can grasp this. We are in Iraq because Bush lied to get us there. If had not lied, we would not have gone there. Therefore all 3,333 soldier deaths, however many hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, and everything else is all his fault. The President of The United States Lied to the nation, and Congress, and convinced them to go to war. Thats murder and Treason my friend.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:21 pm
Bush went off the info that was set in front of him by people that was suposed to be our friends and he believed the info just as you are believeing every thing that you read, whether it’s credable or not, does that make you a lier as well??.(No Bush did not lie to us clinton did,and he lied to his wife and daughter ) i do believe that he had no idea of what was realy going on, that at this point it’s a mute problem. now we are so far into it, if we back out it will come home to bite us in the butt. now to let you know i am not happy with all that Bush is doing. here is one point i’ld like to learn more bout. why did he open the mexican boarder. i have no prob with immagrints if they come here legaly. why don’t we here bout this . is it because the dems don’t want us to, and by keeping the war in front line,they don’t have to talk about it.somthing is being hidin from us and it’s not the war
April 27th, 2007 at 4:35 pm
I am asking you staight out, if you read some thing or some one tells you some thing that you believe to be the truth and you repeat it and find out latter that the info was wrong, does that make you a lier????
April 29th, 2007 at 7:58 am
Not if you acknowledge that what you said before was wrong. It’s only a lie if you know what you are saying is untrue. If you later find out it was untrue and continue to say it, thats a lie. If you go back and say you were wrong, that is not a lie.
April 29th, 2007 at 2:51 pm
So tell me HL was Wilson wrong, because he hasn’t admitted that everything he and his wife said was a lie and it has all been proven a lie.
Do you know for a fact that Iraq wasn’t trying to start its WMD program back up? Do you know for a fact that Bush and everyone else lied about Iraq? Come on HL your big on facts well lets see them because all I hear out of your is assumptions and theroys no facts. Everything you paste on here is the same thing the media says not fact. You try to use things like Clinton’s speach as fact. Now you have die hards that were for the US staying out of Iraq like Michael Ware who are saying that the US can’t leave Iraq now.
April 29th, 2007 at 3:05 pm
Oh yeah you want the website on Michael Ware saying we can’t leave Iraq don’t ya.
://newsbusters.org/node/12321
Ware took dead aim at Democratic schemes for pulling out of Iraq, saying that debating a U.S. troop withdrawal was “delusional†and such a step would amount to “giving Iraq to Iran…and al Qaeda. That’s who would own it.â€
Apparently Ware has no doubt that al Qaeda has made Iraq a central front in their battle against the U.S., and that the U.S. pulling out would hand al Qaeda a huge victory
Ware agreed, but argued that winning the war was in America’s best interest: “Well, even more than that, if you just wanted to look at it in terms of purely American national interest, if U.S. troops leave now, you’re giving Iraq to Iran, a member of President Bush’s ‘Axis of Evil,’ and al Qaeda. That’s who will own it. And so, coming back now, I’m struck by the nature of the debate on Capitol Hill, how delusional it is. Whether you’re for this war, or against it; whether you’ve supported the way it’s been executed, or not; it doesn’t matter. You’ve broke it, you’ve got to fix it now. You can’t leave, or it’s going to come and blow back on America.â€
And what does that last sentence say HL. “You can’t leave, or it’s going to come and blow back on America.” So I guess you and your Democrats are WRONG AGAIN.
May 3rd, 2007 at 3:34 pm
2001 – 2007: LAPD’s Reign of Terror Unchecked
The brutal rampage by LAPD in McArthur Park on May 1, 2007 was culmination of a 6-year old secret but intricate policy by the Bush administration and local forces of the extreme right in reversing attempts to reform LAPD after Rodney King Beating and Rampart Corruption Scandal.
Los Angeles, May 3, 2007 — In early 1999, the US Department of Justice under then-US Attorney General Janet Reno began an aggressive plan to impose reform upon LAPD. By the time the LAPD’s Rampart Corruption Scandal became public in 1998, the Clinton administration knew that previous attempts to reform one of the largest police departments in the World had largely failed.
In June 1999, rumors began to circulate within the ranks of the LAPD and its powerful union (Police Protective League – PPL) that Bill Clinton and Janet Reno were about to implement drastic anti-corruption measures against LAPD. At the time, the LAPD and PPL alleged that these acts represented the federal government’s attempt to “violate the LAPD’s 10th amendment rights” and interfere in LAPD’s “internal affairs.” These rumors, however, were not baseless. During 1999, Janet Reno’s US Attorneys in Washington, D.C. were busy drafting a historic federal civil rights lawsuit against LAPD in which the Clinton administration was charging LAPD with “endemic corruption and systematic violation of constitutional rights of residents of Los Angeles.” Additionally, at US DOJ headquarters at 950 Pennsylvania Avenue serious discussions were taking place about using the federal funding of the LAPD as leverage in imposing anti-corruption reform on LAPD.
Sensing the warning of the tsunami coming from Washington in their direction, the LAPD and its PPL began to brace for a defensive position. The LAPD and PPL knew that first they needed to secure the local front. They needed to get rid of Gil Garcetti, the Los Angeles County District Attorney who had begun to prosecute LAPD officers for corruption. In September 1999, LAPD and PPL funded and fielded Steven Cooley, a Republican, as their own candidate for the LA District Attorney position. LAPD and PPL knew too well that if they took over the District Attorney’s office, they would at least be shielded from criminal prosecution on state charges. They remained, however, gravely concerned about what Bill Clinton and Janet Reno had in mind for LAPD.
In September 1999, the Republican Cooley began his PPL-funded campaign to unseat DA Garcetti. PPL was vehemently against Garcetti’s criminal prosecution of LAPD officers. In his 1999-2000 camping against Garcetti, Cooley received more than $1 million from PPL while publicly speaking against police corruption in Rampart Corruption Scandal and criticizing Garcetti for not being forceful and efficient enough in his criminal prosecution of corrupt officers. Of course, Cooley was engaging in blatant public deception since he knew that he had received the $1 million from PPL to try to unseat Garcetti and shield LAPD officers from any further criminal prosecution.
On the federal level, significant developments were taking place. Janet Reno and Bill Clinton were putting their final touches on the draft of the federal civil rights lawsuit against LAPD. On October 11, 2000, then-governor Bush made the following statement in his televised debate with Al Gore in North Carolina: “One of my concerns, though, is I don’t want to federalize the local police forces. I want to — obviously in the egregious cases we need to enforce civil rights law, but we need to make sure that internal affairs decisions at the local level do their job and be given a chance to do their job. I believe in local control of governments, and obviously if they don’t there needs to be a consequence at the federal level.” Bush, however, knew that the LAPD’s “Internal Affairs” was a source of corruption in itself.
On November 2, 2000, Janet Reno filed her historic anti-corruption lawsuit against LAPD in federal court in Los Angeles. LAPD was charged with systemic violations of civil rights, including, “having a pattern of arresting residents of Los Angeles without probable cause.” SEE page 2 of the Complaint at: http://www.freemarje.com/US%20Fed%20Lawsuit%20v%20LAPD%2011-03-00.pdf
Necertheless, two historical events followed which reversed the course of anti-corruption attempts at LAPD for the following six years. In fact, these two events resulted in empowering and expanding the forces of corruption in the LAPD on a gigantic scale. On December 12, 2000, George Bush was declared as the new President of the United States. On November 7, 2000, Republican Cooley, with substantial backing from PPL, defeated Gil Garcetti. Cooley became the new District Attorney of Los Angeles on January 1, 2001. Within two weeks after taking office, he disbanded the special investigation office within the DA office Garcetti had set up to fight LAPD corruption through criminal prosecution of corrupt LAPD officers.
The above two historical events had drastic and severely detrimental consequences for the people of Los Angeles. On the federal front, the Bush administration brought the federal litigation against LAPD to a screeching halt. The management of the Federal Consent Decree by Ashcroft and Gonzales became a practice in public deception. All federal efforts to reform LAPD were abandoned and the Bush administration began to turn its face the other way as LAPD became more aggressive and emboldened in its rampage against those who came into contact with its unconstitutional and brutal forces. With full support from the Bush administration, police brutality, misconduct, deception, fraud, perjury, fabrication of evidence, and criminal activities by police officers achieved new high marks in the history of Los Angeles.
On local level, Cooley shielded corrupt LAPD officers from any and all criminal prosecution. No more LAPD officers were prosecuted. Even when an LAPD officer fired multiple shots at a 13-year-old boy backing a car at 2 miles per hour, the prosecutor Cooley refused to prosecute the liable LAPD officer for murder. When a disabled black teenager (Donovan Jackson) was beaten up by white LAPD officers on national TV, Cooley and LAPD conspired to prevent a Rodney King type of reaction from the public by deceptively putting the officers on a circus-style criminal trial while at the same time undermined the chances of conviction by removing a seasoned prosecutor and assigning a young lawyer with no experience in such prosecutions. By botching the trial, Cooley guaranteed that LAPD officers Jeremy Morse and Bijan Darvish would not be convicted. Cooley proved to be a loyal puppet of LAPD. He was aggressively bringing criminal charges against victims of police misconduct, knowing that winning criminal convictions against victims of LAPD misconduct prevented them from filing future civil rights lawsuits. In his reelection campaign in March 2004, Cooley received more than $1.5 million in campaign contribution, mostly from the LAPD’s PPL. His closest opponent had collected $25,000. Cooley won his reelection to a second-term as the LA’s District Attorney.
During the 2001-2007 Bush-Cooley’s reign of terror in Los Angeles, hundreds of victims of police brutality and police misconduct cases were charged with baseless and fabricated criminal charges. Cooley and LAPD worked together on fabrication and manufacturing of false evidence against victims. At the same time, LAPD’s PPL had begun to finance the reelection of those state judges whom Cooley and LAPD enjoyed to work with. Hundreds were convicted and sent to prison. State convictions guaranteed that LAPD was shielded from future civil rights lawsuits. During the above period, no LAPD officers were ever charged with any crime arising from fabrication and false manufacturing of evidence.
An example of this policy of terror and criminal conspiracy is in the case of a Swedish woman and mother who was held in pretrial detention for more than four years (2002-2006) based on evidence fabricated by Cooley’s DA office and LAPD. Despite four years of incarceration, the woman refused to plea guilty to the charges fabricated by LAPD and Cooley. The case had begun as a police misconduct case when LAPD officers had entered the woman’s home without a warrant and by mistake had arrested her while she was unconscious from a wrongly prescribed medication. The officers had wrongly assumed the woman was suffering from an illegal drug overdose. Cooley filed criminal charges against the woman in order to cover up the LAPD misconduct. Further information on this case can be viewed at http://www.freemarje.com.
What happened in McArthur Park on May 1, 2007 was the culmination of LAPD’s reign of terror under Bush-Cooley policy during 2001-2007. During the above period, the residents of Los Angeles were left defenseless against forces of the extreme right which implemented their policy of deception, fraud, and criminal conspiracy.
The events of May 1, 2007 showed that LAPD with the help of its financed puppet DA Cooley and under the protection of the Bush administration has succeeded in establishing a police state in the largest county of the United States, a jurisdiction ruled with the iron fist of a police junta composed of the LAPD, Cooley, and an army of 600 mostly corrupt judges who owe their reelections to financial contributions from LAPD’s PPL. These judges know that without LAPD’s money, they would not be reelected. For further information on how various intricate components of this police junta operate, see pages 19-26 at http://www.freemarje.com/Federal%20Complaint%20Filed%20Against%20Defendants.pdf.