Cain Adviser: Asking Whether ?999? Plan Raises Taxes On The Poor Is Just ?Washington Thinking?
Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on October 12th, 2011 4:36 am by HL
Cain Adviser: Asking Whether ?999? Plan Raises Taxes On The Poor Is Just ?Washington Thinking?
As we’ve been reporting, GOP 2012 presidential candidate Herman Cain’s “999″ tax plan — which would eliminate all taxes in favor of a 9 percent income tax, 9 percent corporate income tax, and 9 percent national sales tax — would wallop low-income Americans (all of the candidate’s protestations notwithstanding). On average, the lowest-income Americans would […]
As we’ve been reporting, GOP 2012 presidential candidate Herman Cain’s “999″ tax plan — which would eliminate all taxes in favor of a 9 percent income tax, 9 percent corporate income tax, and 9 percent national sales tax — would wallop low-income Americans (all of the candidate’s protestations notwithstanding). On average, the lowest-income Americans would see their tax rate multiplies nine times, from about 2 percent to about 18 percent, under Cain’s plan.
But according to Rich Lowrie, the Wells Fargo wealth manager who helped Cain craft the plan, it’s just “Washington thinking” to try and deduce how hard Cain’s plan will hammer those who can least afford it:
Lowrie says it’s just “Washington thinking” to look at whether modest-income Americans will wind up shouldering much more of the tax burden. He repeatedly refused to say how much more of the tax burden would be borne by the poor and middle class than under the current system. But he implicitly acknowledged the problem by saying that the campaign would “fix this” with a new empowerment-zone plan that would be laid on top of the 9-9-9 plan and would presumably lower taxes in inner cities.
Cain’s sales tax would be levied on just about everything, including food and housing (which have traditionally been exempted from sales taxes), pounding low-income Americans, who spend nearly all of what they earn in a given year on necessities. At the same time, Cain would eliminate investment taxes which, along with lowering the income tax rate all the way down to nine percent, would result in a massive tax windfall for the wealthy.
As Center for American Progress Vice President for Economic Policy Michael Ettlinger put it, the plan “would be the biggest tax shift from the wealthy to the middle-class in the history of taxation, ever, anywhere, and it would bankrupt the country.” But Lowrie “acknowledged that Cain didn’t care about progressivity,” which perhaps explains why he is so nonchalant about a plan that would unabashedly give poor Americans the short end of the stick.
Characteristics Of The Intrepid Female Reporter
This weekend Ides of March, the George Clooney-directed political drama based on the Beau Willimon play Farragut North, opened across the country. Lots of folks says feminist pinup boy Ryan Gosling delivers an excellent performance — and I agree, but I want to focus this post on Marisa Tomei’s character — or should I say […]
This weekend Ides of March, the George Clooney-directed political drama based on the Beau Willimon play Farragut North, opened across the country. Lots of folks says feminist pinup boy Ryan Gosling delivers an excellent performance — and I agree, but I want to focus this post on Marisa Tomei’s character — or should I say archetype — in the film. Tomei, in a departure from her usual aging stripper role, plays a New York Times reporter named Ida Horowicz.
Tomei’s character is part of an increasing archetype in modern film — particularly thrillers and political dramas: the plucky/intrepid female reporter/blogger. While this archetype was typically fulfilled in the past by a balding, middle-aged, overweight, sloppy white guy, it is a role that is becoming increasingly modernized through better fashion, more technology, and, yes, the presence of women in the newsroom.
In other words, female journalists can breathe a sigh of relief that they’re no longer relegated to portrayals of ladymag journalists in which they use their own love lives as writing material a la Kate Hudson in 10 Things I Hate About You. While it’s great to see serious political reporters increasingly played by women, writers of these scripts seem to fall all too often seem to sub in some of the same basic characteristics over and over again.
They flirt with male sources to get information. Tomei, in Ides of March, alternates telling Gosling she “loves him” and “hates him” depending on what information she gets out of him. Later, Philip Seymour Hoffman’s character Paul universalizes this love/hate media relationship, but it’s hard to deny that Tomei plays this off as a flirtatious scene. I think lots of female reporters find this pattern a bit, um, irritating. After all, throwing in the flirting sends a message that female reporters can’t cover a serious beat without using sex appeal to get the information. I’m not going to say it never happens, but I’d like to think that all those female journalists didn’t rely on flirting for every big story. And why don’t female journalists ever call up female sources in on television or in film?
They’re usually depicted as “bloggers,” sometimes with a joke about how blogging isn’t real journalism thrown in. This was, perhaps, one of the most-discussed aspects of the American adaptation of State of Play. (Alyssa herself wrote about it back when the film first came out for the Atlantic.) Rachel McAdams was depicted as a blogger/reporter Della Frye for the paper, which was deemed lower on the totem pole than grizzled reporter Cal McAffrey (Russell Crowe). And let’s face it: McAdams’ character was sometimes portrayed as naïve at best, incompetent at worst. Crowe’s character threw in plenty of snide comments about blogging as somehow separate from journalism, which, for a film released in 2009, just felt dated.
They tend to focus on the scandalous. It’s hard to shake the reporter, Petra Moritz (Lily Rabe), in last season’s The Good Wife as she hunted down the truth on whether Peter Florrick (Chris North) had had another affair. That scene depicting the phone call between her and Alicia (Julianna Margulies), as she kept pushing the personal details — “Have you had an AIDS test?” — is downright uncomfortable and makes the Petra character come off as scummy.
They’re usually white. Unfortunately, this stereotype is becoming truer and truer as newsroom diversity drops (it’s hard to say if this is true with new media, since online newsrooms rarely fill out the diversity survey). And while the number of female reporters is on the rise, perhaps reflected in the prevalence of the plucky female reporter on television and in film, real-life female reporters usually have male bosses. According to a Reuters report released this year, only 23 percent of top-level management postions are held by women.
So, props to Hollywood for acknowledging that women can be hard-nosed reporter types, but it seems that, sadly, they still need some diversity and character development.
