Fox News’ Bulls & Bears makes dubious claim that plan to tax banks will cause ATM fees to rise
Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on January 17th, 2010 5:47 am by HL
Fox News’ Bulls & Bears makes dubious claim that plan to tax banks will cause ATM fees to rise
On Fox News’ Bull & Bears, while discussing President Obama’s plan to tax the nation’s largest banks, host Brenda Buttner claimed that it’s “going to be the consumers who get hit, ultimately”; Fox Business Network host Eric Bolling agreed, responding that the tax would be passed “right down to the depositors, through ATM fees, through check fees, through lower rates.” However, according to economist Dean Baker, since the tax “only applies to the largest banks, it would not be possible for the banks to pass it along to consumers, since they would lose market share to smaller banks who don’t pay the tax.”
Fox News’ Bolling and Buttner: “Consumers” will get hit by Obama’s bank tax
From the January 16 edition of Fox News’ Bull & Bears:
BUTTNER: It’s going to be the consumers who get hit, ultimately, isn’t it?
BOLLING: Unfortunately, that’s what’s going to end up happening. The fifty banks or so that are going to get slapped with this tax, they’re going to get fees, and they’re going to drop it right down to the depositors, through ATM fees, through check fees, through lower rates, the bottom line is –
TOBIN B. SMITH (Fox Business Network contributor): Less lending –
BOLLING: Less lending.
Baker: Not possible for banks to pass tax along to consumers
Baker: “it would not be possible for the banks to pass [tax] along to consumers.” In a January 15 post on his American Prospect blog Beat the Press, Baker noted that since the tax applies only to the largest banks, if they passed along fees to consumers, they “would lose market share to smaller banks who don’t pay the tax. (If they could charge their customers more, why aren’t they doing it already?)” From Baker’s post:
It would also be helpful if reporters tried to evaluate the assertion of the industry lobbyists that this (or other) taxes will simply be passed on to customers. Reporters should have the time and ability to do make such an evaluation, rather than just pass along a he said/she said to readers, almost none of whom will have the time or expertise to make this assessment.
In the case of this tax, since it only applies to the largest banks, it would not be possible for the banks to pass it along to consumers, since they would lose market share to smaller banks who don’t pay the tax. (If they could charge their customers more, why aren’t they doing it already?) The alternative scenario, in which the large banks are able to pass on the tax, would suggest a degree of concentration in the industry which should require anti-trust action.
Bulls & Bears claim echoed Limbaugh’s dubious assertion
Limbaugh: “your ATM fee’s gonna go up” because of bank tax. On the January 14 edition of his radio program, Rush Limbaugh told listeners that their lives “might get worse because your ATM fee’s gonna go up. As these banks are taxed, they’re gonna pass as much of it along to you and all of us as possible. That’s just how it works, which Obama also knows.”
