The Hollywood Liberal

Clinton: We’re ‘Not Getting Through’ to Pakistanis
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton faced the unenviable task of trying to change U.S.-Pakistani relations for the better during her three-day diplomacy spree in the South Asian nation. However, it was unclear as her visit drew to a close whether she’d made any headway, as she herself acknowledged on Friday.  —KA AP via The Miami Herald: Clinton put her case directly to the public Friday in televised appearances in Islamabad, the Pakistani capital, fielding angry questions about the alleged activities of U.S. contractor Blackwater in Pakistan, the tough conditions that came with a $1.5 billion-a-year American aid package and alleged U.S. favoritism toward Pakistan’s archenemy, India. One tribesman bluntly told her: “Your presence in the region is not good for peace.” “We are fighting a war that is imposed on us. It’s not our war. It is your war,” journalist Asma Shirazi told Clinton during the women’s meeting. “You had one 9-11. We are having daily 9-11s in Pakistan.” Clinton later told CNN that she was well aware of the “pretty negative situation” in Pakistan before she got here. “I wanted to have these interactions. … I don’t think the way you deal with negative feelings is to pretend they’re not there … or just come with happy talk.” Read more Watch Clinton describe the U.S. position in Pakistan in Lahore on Friday in this AP clip: READ THE WHOLE ITEM

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton faced the unenviable task of trying to change U.S.-Pakistani relations for the better during her three-day diplomacy spree in the South Asian nation. However, it was unclear as her visit drew to a close whether she’d made any headway, as she herself acknowledged on Friday.? —KA

AP via The Miami Herald:

Clinton put her case directly to the public Friday in televised appearances in Islamabad, the Pakistani capital, fielding angry questions about the alleged activities of U.S. contractor Blackwater in Pakistan, the tough conditions that came with a $1.5 billion-a-year American aid package and alleged U.S. favoritism toward Pakistan’s archenemy, India.

One tribesman bluntly told her: “Your presence in the region is not good for peace.”

“We are fighting a war that is imposed on us. It’s not our war. It is your war,” journalist Asma Shirazi told Clinton during the women’s meeting. “You had one 9-11. We are having daily 9-11s in Pakistan.”

Clinton later told CNN that she was well aware of the “pretty negative situation” in Pakistan before she got here. “I wanted to have these interactions. … I don’t think the way you deal with negative feelings is to pretend they’re not there … or just come with happy talk.”

Read more

Watch Clinton describe the U.S. position in Pakistan in Lahore on Friday in this AP clip:

READ THE WHOLE ITEM

Related Entries

• October 13, 2009 Why Stop at a Web Site When You Can Redesign the Whole Party?
• September 30, 2009 Want to Reach Moviegoers? Go Online
• September 29, 2009 Secret Service Investigating Facebook Poll
• September 28, 2009 The War on Language
• September 21, 2009 FCC Backs Net Neutrality

Paul Abrams: Pop Quiz: Under Reagan, What Was Peak Unemployment, How Long Before It Began Declining?
Buddy, can you spare a credit default option? Class, come to order. Yesterday, we discussed the dismal unemployment numbers, and what those numbers translated into…

Arianna Huffington: Sunday Roundup
I should sue John McCain. Three and a half years ago, writing about Net Neutrality, the attempt to guarantee the Internet stays free and open, I said that it was a slam-dunk issue being hampered by a lousy name — one that evokes a tennis match in Switzerland or basketball players who don’t choose sides. And I suggested some alternatives, including The Fast, Downloadable Porn Act and The Internet Freedom Act. Cut to last week, when McCain, the number one recipient of telecom campaign cash in Congress, introduced a bill that would effectively kill Net Neutrality. The name of his bill? The Internet Freedom Act! Paging George Orwell! War is Peace, Ignorance is Strength, and Freedom is… an Internet controlled by AT&T and Verizon. We can’t let that happen. Support Net Neutrality. Let’s start by giving it a better name.

Lee Stranahan: Stop The House Bill That Will Raise Premiums 25% (VIDEO)
I’ve come to the conclusion that the House health care reform must die and I’ve made a 30 second video to tell you one reason…

FBI Watch List Includes 400,000 People
During a 12-month period ended in March this year, for example, the U.S. intelligence community suggested on a daily basis that 1,600 people qualified for…

Conservative media push distorted comments to claim Clinton “admitted” Democrats tax everything

Numerous conservative media outlets are pushing a distortion of comments made by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during a roundtable discussion with business leaders in Pakistan to suggest that she celebrated the notion that “[w]e tax everything that moves and doesn’t move,” in contrast to lower tax rates in Pakistan. But in her comments, Clinton actually called on Pakistan to raise more revenue of its own, rather than relying on U.S. aid, and said that U.S. taxpayers and Congress say, “[W]e want to help those who help themselves.”

Pakistan’s Daily Times crops Clinton’s comments

Daily Times: Clinton says Pakistan’s taxes “among the lowest in the world… We (the United States) tax everything that moves and doesn’t move.” Reporting on comments Clinton made during the October 29 roundtable discussion, the Daily Times reported that Clinton said, “The percentage of taxes on GDP (in Pakistan) is among the lowest in the world… We (the United States) tax everything that moves and doesn’t move, and that’s not what we see in Pakistan.”

Clinton discussed tax disparity and foreign aid and said taxpayers and Congress “want to help those who help themselves.” During her roundtable discussion, Clinton called on Pakistan to raise more of its own revenues, rather than relying on foreign aid.

From Clinton’s October 29 roundtable comments:

CLINTON: I appreciate too the idea of a sustainable, long-term partnership, and to highlight the opportunities that exist and to use the tools that are already at our disposal, tools like OPIC or the Export-Import Bank or making sure that travel visas get issued. These are all the kind of nuts-and-bolts issues that we can address and try to resolve together.

But I think too that it is only fair to take a hard look internally about what Pakistan needs to do. And at the risk of maybe sounding undiplomatic, Pakistan has to have more internal investment in your public services and in your business opportunities. By any fair measure, for example, the percentage of taxes of GDP is among the lowest in the world. The United States, we tax ourselves, depending upon who is in power, somewhere between 16 and 23 percent of GDP, and right now, it usually hovers around the 20 percent. You’re less than half of that.

And so at some point, when you ask for partnership, you have to ask what the equity state is that Pakistan itself is looking to make, because it is difficult to go to our taxpayers and say we consider Pakistan a strategic partner, we consider it a long-term friend and ally, we have supported it since its inception in 1947, we want to continue to do so, and have our taxpayers and our members of Congress say, well, we want to help those who help themselves, and we tax everything that moves and doesn’t move, and that’s not what we see happening in Pakistan.

And I can say that because I think there has to be, in any partnership, but more importantly in any plan for your own economic future, a hard look at where you’re going to get the resources to meet these needs. You do have somewhere between 170 and 180 million people. Your population is projected to be about 300 million as the current birth rates, which are among the highest in the world, continue – 2.6 birth rate. I don’t know what you’re going to do with that kind of challenge unless you start planning right now.

Conservative media push distorted comments to suggest Clinton celebrated taxing “everything that moves”

Gateway Pundit: Clinton “[a]dmits” “that the democrats tax everything that moves.” In an October 30 blog post on Gatewaypundit.com, titled, “Hillary Clinton Admits: ‘We Tax Everything That Moves,’ ” Jim Hoft wrote that Clinton “told the Pakistanis today that the democrats tax everything that moves” and asserted that “she’s proud of it.”

Drudge: “Hillary: ‘We tax everything that moves and doesn’t move.’ “ The Drudge Report linked to the Daily Times article on October 31 with the headline, “Hillary: ‘We tax everything that moves and doesn’t move.’ “

Fox Nation: “Hillary: ‘We tax everything that moves.’ “ Linking to the Daily Times article on October 30, the Fox Nation featured the headline, “Hillary: ‘We tax everything that moves.’ “

Prosecutor: Top Scientist Nozette Admitted Actual Spying For Israel
Did a federal prosecutor just make the inflammatory accusation that top government scientist Stewart Nozette has admitted to giving classified information to the Israeli government? By our reading of this AP story, that’s exactly what happened at a hearing in…

Cheney Wanted McClellan To Exonerate Libby As Well As Rove
Dick Cheney told FBI investigators he wasn’t happy when Scott McClelllan, then the White House press secretary, publicly told reporters that Karl Rove wasn’t the source of the Plame leak.

Cheney: Sending Wilson To Niger Was “Amateur Hour” At The CIA
Dick Cheney told FBI investigators that his response to hearing that Joe Wilson had been sent to Niger to assess whether Saddam had tried to buy yellow-cake was that it was “amateur hour out at the CIA.”

Young Rush: The Happy Halloween Special Edition

Republicans, Hagel, and Hypocrisy
This past week the Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) issued another one of their typically hysterical press releases. This time they were aghast at the fact that former Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE) was appointed to serve on the President’s National Intelligence…


Sponsored Topics: Chuck Hagel – Barack Obama – Republican – Republican Jewish Coalition – United States

Bring Out the Cots
So Joe Lieberman thinks he’s a mighty force? Here’s what Harry Reid could tell him and his stalwart allies: Show us the mettle, Joe & Co. If you want to filibuster, make it a real filibuster. None of this namby-pamby…


Sponsored Topics: Harry Reid – Joe Lieberman – Filibuster – United States – South Carolina

Open Up Your Arms
Last week, I heard a baffling statistic. More Americans followed news of the runaway balloon than coverage of the war in Afghanistan. With this noise clogging the media landscape, it’s hard to get the general public to pay attention to…


Sponsored Topics: Iraq – United States – War in Afghanistan – Afghanistan – Warfare and Conflict

GOP establishment-backed candidate Dede Scozzafava withdraws from NY-23 special election.
In recent weeks, the special congressional election in New York’s 23 district has been heating up, with “big tent” and “establishment” Republicans — such as Newt Gingrich, the RNC, and the NRCC — backing Dede Scozzafava, and “purist” Republicans — such as Sarah Palin, Rick Santorum, and Bill Kristol — backing Conservative Party candidate Doug […]

In recent weeks, the special congressional election in New York’s 23 district has been heating up, with “big tent” and “establishment” Republicans — such as Newt Gingrich, the RNC, and the NRCC — backing Dede Scozzafava, and “purist” Republicans — such as Sarah Palin, Rick Santorum, and Bill Kristol — backing Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman. Scozzafava had been “under siege” from these conservatives “because she supported gay rights and abortion rights and was considered too liberal on various fiscal issues.” Today — just three days before the election — Scozzafava has announced that she’s withdrawing because polling shows her too far behind to win:

“Today, I again seek to act for the good of our community,” Ms. Scozzafava wrote in a letter to friends and supporters. “It is increasingly clear that pressure is mounting on many of my supporters to shift their support. Consequently, I hereby release those individuals who have endorsed and supported my campaign to transfer their support as they see fit to do so. I am and have always been a proud Republican. It is my hope that with my actions today, my party will emerge stronger and our district and our nation can take an important step towards restoring the enduring strength and economic prosperity that has defined us for generations.

Scozzafava has not yet thrown her support behind either Hoffman or Democratic candidate Bill Owens, and her name will remain on the ballot. Gingrich recently slammed his fellow conservatives for the “precedent” they’re setting, saying, “So I say to my many conservative friends who suddenly decided that whether they’re from Minnesota or Alaska or Texas, they know more than the upstate New York Republicans? I don’t think so. And I don’t think it’s a good precedent.”

Lieberman on his willingness to derail health care reform: ?I feel relevant.?
After he announced his willingness to filibuster health care reform that includes a public option, Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) defended his position by arguing that if the public option paid lower reimbursement rates than private insurers, medical providers would shift costs to Americans with private coverage. He also called the proposed plan “a new […]

After he announced his willingness to filibuster health care reform that includes a public option, Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) defended his position by arguing that if the public option paid lower reimbursement rates than private insurers, medical providers would shift costs to Americans with private coverage. He also called the proposed plan “a new entitlement program.” As ThinkProgress and others have pointed out, Lieberman either doesn’t understand the details of the public option proposed by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) or he is misrepresenting them. But in a conference call with Connecticut reporters yesterday, Lieberman claimed that it is the more than 60 percent of state residents that back a government-run insurance option that are confused:

What about the more than 60 percent of state residents that back a government-run insurance option, according to a Quinnipiac University poll last month?

Some of those respondents are confused about what such a plan entails, Lieberman said. And he added, “you can’t make a decision like this based on polling,” he said. Ultimately, he he said he has to do “what I think is right and hope in the end the people of Connecticut will respect me for that.”

Describing how his openness to derailing reform affected his role in the health care debate, Lieberman told the reporters, “I feel relevant.”

The Talk Shows
Guests to be interviewed Sunday on major television talk shows:

1,600 are suggested daily for FBI’s list
Newly released FBI data offer evidence of the broad scope and complexity of the nation’s terrorist watch list, documenting a daily flood of names nominated for inclusion to the controversial list.

Karzai challenger prepares to drop out of presidential race
KABUL — The top challenger to President Hamid Karzai in the Nov. 7 election prepared Saturday to withdraw from the race, complicating President Obama’s deliberations over whether to expand the war effort in Afghanistan at a critical moment.

The Accident That Toppled History
Mary Elise Sarotte, Washington Post
BERLIN — Once events make their passage from news of the day into history books, it is hard to imagine that they could have happened any other way. They're history, after all. And 20 years later, the fall of the Berlin Wall seems like that kind of history — a world-changing event that we commemorate and celebrate, its heroes and villains well established, its images and significance clearly comprehended.But the real story of the wall coming down is a lot less tidy than it may appear in the rear-view mirror. The "decision" to open the border was not a conscious choice…

Will J Street Disavow Its Extreme Left Flank?
James Kirchick, TNR
The self-declared mission of J Street, the dovish "pro-Israel, pro-Peace" lobby that just concluded its first national conference this week, includes redefining the meaning of the term "pro-Israel." For too long, the organization's founders and supporters argue, right-wing elements in the Jewish community have abused the term to hijack the debate and tarnish mainstream, sensible advocates of a two-state solution.J Street's "pro-Israel" bona fides were questioned almost immediately after its launch, and with good reason. For…

Splitting the Difference and Losing
Donnelly & Sullivan, Weekly Standard
Increase Font SizePrinter-FriendlyEmail a FriendRespond to this articleIn its continuing search for an alternative to General Stanley McChrystal's comprehensive counterinsurgency approach to the war in Afghanistan, and with President Obama having eliminated the minimalist counterterrorism plan of Vice President Joe Biden, the White House has lately been floating a split-the-difference trial balloon: “McChrystal Lite” or, to give the veep his due, “McChrystal for the cities, Biden for the countryside.”Last week the New York Times was allowed a sneak-peak of what this…

A Reaganite or Jacksonian Wave?
Ron Brownstein, National Journal
Sign In nationaljournal.com > National Journal Magazine > Political Connections Sponsored LinksAdvanced Searchby Ronald BrownsteinSaturday, Oct. 31, 2009Fittingly for a politician who represents Las Vegas, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., this week doubled down on his party's defining political bet.From the White House to Capitol Hill, Democrats are wagering that they can sell Americans on a sweeping and in some ways unprecedented expansion of government's reach to confront both the immediate economic downturn and such long-term challenges as health care and…

Dems’ Deep Divisions on Health Care
Michael Tanner, New York Post
By MICHAEL TANNER Last Updated: 4:39 AM, October 31, 2009 Posted: 12:28 AM, October 31, 2009 Weary of news stories that legislative support for health-care reform is all but dead, Democratic leaders have been seizing every handy podium to declare that “the votes are almost there,” “there is 90 percent agreement” on a proposal, “we are now…