Birbirinden ateşli özbek sex videolarına hemen sizde izlemeye başlayın. Yeni fantazi olan eşli seks ile ilgili içeriklerimiz ilginizi çekebilir. Çeşitli sekreter türk içerikleri son derece heyecanlandırıcı ve zevk verici duruyor. İnternet ortamında güvenilir bir depolama sistemi olan dosya yükle adresimiz sizleri için sorunsuz bir şekilde aktif durumda. Hiç bir bilsiyar keysiz kalmasın diye özel bir indirim Windows 10 Pro Lisans Key Satın Al kampanyasına mutlaka göz atın. Android cihazlarda Dream League Soccer 2020 hileli apk ile beraber sizler de sınırsız oyun keyfine hemen dahil olun. Popüler oyun olan Clash Royale apk indir ile tüm bombaları ücretsiz erişim imkanını kaçırmayın. Sosyal medya üzerinden facebook beğenisi satın al adresi sizlere büyük bir popülerlik katmanıza imkan sağlamaktadır. Erotik kadınlardan oluşan canlı sex numaraları sizlere eğlenceye davet ediyor. Bağlantı sağladığınız bayanlara sex sohbet etmekte dilediğiniz gibi özgürsünüz. Dilediğiniz zaman arayabileceğiniz sex telefon numaraları ile zevkin doruklarına çıkın. Kadınların birbirleri ile yarış yaptığı canlı sohbet hattı hizmeti sayesinde fantazi dünyanız büyük ölçüde gelişecek. Sizlerde hemen bir tık uzağınızda olan sex hattı hizmetine başvurarak arama yapmaya başlayın. İnternet ortamında bulamayacağınız kadın telefon numaraları sitemiz üzerinden hemen erişime bağlı bir şekilde ulaşın. Whatsapp üzerinden sıcak sohbetler için whatsapp sex hattı ile bayanların sohbetine katılabilirsin. Erotik telefonda sohbet ile sitemizde ki beğendiğiniz kadına hemen ulaşın. Alo Sex Numaraları kadınlarına ücretsiz bir şekilde bağlan!
supertotobet superbetin marsbahis kolaybet interbahis online casino siteleri bonus veren siteler
We are the Liberal Blog From Hollywood
L.A.'s Premier Post Facility

Film / Movie Quality Control Reports


Hot Pics & Gossip.

Archive for October, 2009

Winning the Peace

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on October 28th, 2009 4:38 am by HL

Winning the Peace
With all the Bloviators pulling out their “Afghanistan=Vietnam” analogies, Joshua Kurlantzick writes in the Washington Post, that we should only be so lucky. 76 percent of Vietnamese say U.S. influence in Asia is positive, according to a 2008 study by…


Sponsored Topics: VietnamWashington PostAsiaAfghanistanUnited States

Praying At J Street
I don’t know what did it. Sure Jeremy Ben Ami worked for two years to get to this moment, and then assembled a terrific team. Obama helped. So did the disastrous Gaza war and its ugly aftermath. And then the…


Sponsored Topics: J StreetNew YorkUnited StatesIsraelEthnicity

Presented By:


Inhofe: ?Natural warming cycle? ended ?about nine years ago.?

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on October 28th, 2009 4:37 am by HL

Inhofe: ?Natural warming cycle? ended ?about nine years ago.?
At the outset of Senate hearings on clean energy and climate legislation today, Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), ranking member of the Environment and Public Works Commitee, mockingly praised chair Barbara Boxer (D-CA) for mentioning “global warming” in a YouTube video about the bill. Inhofe claimed that people “have been running from that term” once “that […]

At the outset of Senate hearings on clean energy and climate legislation today, Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), ranking member of the Environment and Public Works Commitee, mockingly praised chair Barbara Boxer (D-CA) for mentioning “global warming” in a YouTube video about the bill. Inhofe claimed that people “have been running from that term” once “that natural warming cycle” ended “nine years ago”:

I do want to congratulate you on your Youtube, the fact you’re using the term global warming again, I appreciate that. People have been running from that term ever since we went out of that natural warming cycle about nine years ago.

Watch it:

Inhofe’s dangerous nonsense has been debunked repeatedly by scientists, from the UK Met Office and NOAA to independent statisticians. 2005 is the hottest year on record, and the last ten years have been the hottest decade on record. Furthermore, it is clear that fossil fuel emissions are responsible.


A nuclear power boost for bill

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on October 28th, 2009 4:36 am by HL

A nuclear power boost for bill
Will a heaping spoonful of nuclear power help Congress swallow a climate bill?


Proposed long-term insurance program raises questions
As congressional leaders haggle over the shape of a proposed government-run “public option” in health-care reform legislation, a quiet revolt is brewing against a different public insurance program — a plan to create government insurance for long-term care.


Business Digest: House panel votes to regulate hedge funds
OVERSIGHT The government would gain far-reaching new powers to regulate, and even shut down, large financial firms that threaten economic stability under a draft bill released Tuesday in Congress.


Freaked Out Over SuperFreakonomics

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on October 28th, 2009 4:32 am by HL

Freaked Out Over SuperFreakonomics
Bret Stephens, Wall Street Journal
Suppose for a minute—which is about 59 seconds too long, but that's for another column—that global warming poses an imminent threat to the survival of our species. Suppose, too, that the best solution involves a helium balloon, several miles of garden hose and a harmless stream of sulfur dioxide being pumped into the upper atmosphere, all at a cost of a single F-22 fighter jet. Good news, right? Maybe, but not if you're Al Gore or one of his little helpers.The hose-in-the-sky approach to global warming is the brainchild of Intellectual Ventures, a Bellevue,…

If the Public Option is Back, Why Such a Heavy Lift?
Rich Lowry, NY Post
The public option is back. Its Lazarus act is hailed as a sign of how rosy the health- care debate looks for Democrats. August is but a sepia-tinged memory. Passage of a sweeping bill is now considered a lock by the wisest Beltway pundits. And legislation may even include the most shining prize of all, the public option that liberals — no matter what the talking points for public consumption — consider a way station to the Valhalla of a government-controlled system.

Obama’s Foreign Policy Deserves High Grades
Juan Cole, Salon


Is CNN the Least Trusted Name in News?

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on October 27th, 2009 4:46 am by HL

Is CNN the Least Trusted Name in News?
The original cable news network has slipped to fourth and last place with prime-time viewers between ages 25 and 54, trailing Fox News, MSNBC and HLN. The conventional wisdom is that Americans prefer their news with a heavy dose of opinion, but CNN could be losing viewers because, as the “Daily Show” points out, the network is just bad at gathering news. While we’re talking in broad strokes about what Americans like and don’t like, let’s take a minute to point out that the cable news networks measure their viewers in the hundreds of thousands. In a country of 300 million, it’s probably ill-advised to draw conclusions about the national character based on Sean Hannity’s 659,000 viewers.  —PZS The New York Times: CNN, which invented the cable news network more than two decades ago, will hit a new competitive low with its prime-time programs in October, finishing fourth – and last – among the cable news networks with the audience that all the networks rely on for their advertising. The official monthly numbers will be finalized at 4 p.m. Monday and will include results from Friday. CNN executives conceded that will not change the competitive standing for the month. CNN will still be last in prime time. Read more READ THE WHOLE ITEM

The original cable news network has slipped to fourth and last place with prime-time viewers between ages 25 and 54, trailing Fox News, MSNBC and HLN. The conventional wisdom is that Americans prefer their news with a heavy dose of opinion, but CNN could be losing viewers because, as the “Daily Show” points out, the network is just bad at gathering news.

While we’re talking in broad strokes about what Americans like and don’t like, let’s take a minute to point out that the cable news networks measure their viewers in the hundreds of thousands. In a country of 300 million, it’s probably ill-advised to draw conclusions about the national character based on Sean Hannity’s 659,000 viewers.? —PZS

The New York Times:

CNN, which invented the cable news network more than two decades ago, will hit a new competitive low with its prime-time programs in October, finishing fourth – and last – among the cable news networks with the audience that all the networks rely on for their advertising.

The official monthly numbers will be finalized at 4 p.m. Monday and will include results from Friday. CNN executives conceded that will not change the competitive standing for the month. CNN will still be last in prime time.

Read more

READ THE WHOLE ITEM



Mike Lux: Game On

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on October 27th, 2009 4:45 am by HL

Mike Lux: Game On
In the coming weeks we will have an all-hands-on-deck, all-out public war with the insurance industry over whether we finally pass comprehensive health care reform or once again fall short.

Vivien Lesnik Weisman: Please Mr. President, Stick To Your Guns and Don’t Pull the Trigger on Public Option
Obama should be worrying less about Reid’s arithmetic and more about losing some progressive senators who may not pass a plan that includes the trigger provision.

Chris Weigant: Media’s Credibility (Not Public Option) Is What Is Dead
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid today announced that the public option (Charles Schumer’s “opt out” plan, in particular) will be contained in the bill he…


Eric Boehlert: 30 reasons why Fox News is not legit

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on October 27th, 2009 4:44 am by HL

Eric Boehlert: 30 reasons why Fox News is not legit

“Journalists should be honest, fair and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information.” — Society of Professional Journalists

Why the Beltway press has invested so much time and energy in recent weeks defending Fox News, with one scribe even claiming that the White House’s public critique of the network was “dangerous to press freedom,” and why the press refuses to acknowledge what’s so obvious about the cable channel’s political pursuits, remains baffling.

The facts regarding Fox News’ lack of professionalism seem rather obvious (as I detail below 30 different times). And that ought to be plain for Beltway journalists as well. But whether for reasons having to do with external professional, social, or political pressures, many journalists have opted to pretend that Fox News is a serious outlet, that it’s just like its cable and network TV news competitors.

They insist that any suggestion that Rupert Murdoch’s cable channel isn’t legitimate is completely off-base and that the White House is not even allowed to have an opinion on the issue. Indeed, ABC News’ Jake Tapper suggested it was not “appropriate” for the administration to tag the channel as illegitimate. (Tapper himself can’t tell the difference between the programming that Fox News and ABC News produce.)

The rush to defend Fox News is an odd one, because I don’t remember the same type of the circle-the-wagons defense when the previous Republican administration openly waged war on The New York Times and NBC, two news outlets whose standards far outshine the kind of pseudo-reporting Fox News produces on a daily basis. That Beltway media elites have decided to rally around Fox News of all entities remains as puzzling as it is short-sighted.

The truth is, journalism is not difficult to practice, nor is it tough to identify. Journalists aren’t licensed, and anyone can try their hand at it, as the Internet has made clear. So there is no higher authority declaring what is and isn’t journalism. But the craft, like obscenity, is instantly recognizable in its true form.

For generations in this country, there has been a sort of a gentleman’s agreement in terms of what constituted professional behavior among journalists. And there has been a sense of shame when members crossed those lines into unprofessional behavior. Bosses chastened those employees, people were fired, and ethics panels were summarily convened to make certain the transgressions didn’t happen again. Fox News, though, has walked away from all of that. And guess what? The rest of the press hasn’t said boo.

That’s been the sad case for years. (Playing dumb about Fox News’ partisan pursuits now qualifies as a Beltway intramural sport.) Indeed, the loophole, or the caveat, to journalism’s gentleman’s agreement has always been that the guidelines were voluntary and self-policing. There was no governing body, either within journalism or without, that regulated the product. The only collective deterrent from producing bad journalism, aside from rather lax U.S. libel laws, is a collective sense of shame, a shared feeling that making a factual error — or worse, purposefully pushing false information under the guise of journalism — was both unprofessional and unacceptable.

But clearly, Fox News does not share that sense of shame, because it’s not part of the larger journalism brotherhood. Fox News doesn’t feel like rules such as fairness, accuracy, neutrality, and independence apply, which is obvious since Fox News breaks those rules with stunning regularity. In fact, its programming day seems designed to break the traditional rules ad nauseam. That’s what it’s built to do. And if nothing else, Fox News is ruthlessly efficient.

So, Fox News has altered the game by unchaining itself from the moral groundings of U.S. journalism. And guess what? There is no industry shame being rained down on the outlet. The rest of the press not only doesn’t complain, it defends Fox News and even apologizes on its behalf, which is what we’ve seen unfold for the last two weeks.

If we’re actually going to have this is-the-world-really-round “debate” about Fox News, then let’s put it in perspective in terms of what constitutes a legitimate news organization.

Here’s how the Society of Professional Journalists describes the craft:

Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist’s credibility.

The organization’s Code of Ethics declares “the Society’s principles and standards of practice.” In terms of a broad-based definition of what journalism ought to be, the Code of Ethics remains the industry standard. And as you’ll see below, Fox News routinely, and blatantly, breaks the code to which ethical journalists are supposed to aspire. Fox News staffers (and not just the opinion show hosts) don’t simply fail to live up to the industry’s own ethical standards. They produce broadcasts that run directly counter to established values and rules. In other words, they obliterate the Code of Ethics on a regular basis, which to me signals that Fox News is not a legitimate source of journalism.

Below are some cornerstones to journalism’s Code of Ethics, followed by clear-cut examples of how Fox News tramples that code:

–Test the accuracy of information from all sources and exercise care to avoid inadvertent error. Deliberate distortion is never permissible.

Timeline of a [madrassa] smear

–Make certain that headlines, news teases and promotional material, photos, video, audio, graphics, sound bites and quotations do not misrepresent. They should not oversimplify or highlight incidents out of context.

After teasing story by saying “Obama makes a little girl cry,” Fox News’ Kelly acknowledged it was not true

–Never distort the content of news photos or video. Image enhancement for technical clarity is always permissible. Label montages and photo illustrations.

Fox News airs altered photos of NY Times reporters

–Never plagiarize.

Fox passes off GOP press release as its own research — typo and all

–Avoid stereotyping by race, gender, age, religion, ethnicity, geography, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance or social status.

Media adopt gender, racial stereotypes in characterizing Sotomayor’s temperament, intellect

–Distinguish between advocacy and news reporting. Analysis and commentary should be labeled and not misrepresent fact or context.

REPORT: “Fair and balanced” Fox News aggressively promotes “tea party” protests

Be sensitive when seeking or using interviews or photographs of those affected by tragedy or grief.

Fox News, CBS air clips of peephole video of ESPN’s Erin Andrews

–Recognize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek power, influence or attention. Only an overriding public need can justify intrusion into anyone’s privacy.

O’Reilly Producer Stalks Amanda Terkel: THE VIDEO

–Show good taste. Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity.

Foxy News breaks out the boudoir B-roll to cover “the great breast augmentation scandal”

–Remain free of associations and activities that may compromise integrity or damage credibility.

Would a real news organization help GOP PACs raise money?

–Refuse gifts, favors, fees, free travel and special treatment, and shun secondary employment, political involvement, public office and service in community organizations if they compromise journalistic integrity.

FLASHBACK: When Fox News boasted about its “unprecedented” access to the Bush White House

–Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable.

After exclusive access, softball interviews during Bush admin, Fox News blasts ABC for White House exclusive

–Admit mistakes and correct them promptly.

EXCLUSIVE: Fox News seeks to confirm wildly inaccurate reporting that it’s already aired on Jennings controversy; former student seeks Fox News correction

I normally wouldn’t spend so much time with the chapter-and-verse examples to highlight the clear fact that Fox News is not a legitimate news organization. But since Beltway media elites continue to cling to the claim that it is, as well as peddle the bizarre, anti-free speech concept that the White House somehow ought to be forbidden to criticize the press, I’ll continue with even more inescapable examples to back up the observation that Fox News is not a legitimate news outlet.

For instance, a legitimate news organization does not:

  • Source its research to “conservative blogs.”
  • Purposefully present stories out of context.
  • Regularly declare “Victory!” when a White House initiative fails.
  • Ignore a breaking news story that embarrasses the Republican Party.
  • Invite fringe conspiracy theorists to appear on news shows.
  • Suggest during a news program that Democrats voted to “protect pedophiles, but not veterans.”
  • Routinely accuse the president of the United States of being like Adolf Hitler.
  • Describe itself as the “voice of the opposition.”
  • Air more than 100 commercials promoting partisan political rallies.
  • Show 22 clips of health care reform opponents who attended town hall forums, and none of health reform supporters.
  • Purchase full-page newspaper ads to spread falsehoods about the news competition.
  • Invade the privacy of second-grade students.
  • Promote violent political rhetoric.
  • Fail to fact-check a murder story before airing allegations about it.
  • Allow a news anchor to suggest a Supreme Court nominee is guilty of “reverse racism.”

It certainly would be helpful if reporters and pundits who work for respected corporate news outlets and who today defend Fox News as a legitimate operation (or at least chastise the White House for raising doubts) examined the 30 examples I listed above and ask themselves this: If they committed just one of those newsroom transgressions, would they still have a job? Would bosses at ABC or The New York Times or The Washington Post or wherever be willing to have those journalists on staff if they bent, and then busted, journalism’s Code of Ethics the way Fox News regularly does?

I suspect the obvious answer is no. And I suspect journalists understand that. So why the Beltway charade? Why refuse to acknowledge the self-evident truth that Fox is not a legitimate news organization?

(Additional research by Simon Maloy.)

Follow Eric Boehlert on Twitter.


GOP Congressman Leading Fight Against Rangel Has His Own Ethics Woes

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on October 27th, 2009 4:43 am by HL

GOP Congressman Leading Fight Against Rangel Has His Own Ethics Woes
Rep. John Carter (R-TX), who is leading the GOP charge against Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.), failed to report nearly $300,000 in profits on his financial disclosure forms.


Presented By:

87-Member Minority Caucus: Muslim ‘Intern Spy’ Hunt Smacks Of McCarthy Era
In a strongly-worded statement today, the Congressional Tri-Caucus, which represents three minority caucuses, denounced a call by four GOP lawmakers for an investigation into whether Muslim “intern spies” have infiltrated the Hill.


Beltway Conventional Wisdom Wrong Again

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on October 27th, 2009 4:38 am by HL

Beltway Conventional Wisdom Wrong Again


The Turning Point?

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts) on October 27th, 2009 4:37 am by HL

The Turning Point?
After the Democratic effort to reform health care took a pounding in August, President Obama’s speech to a joint session of Congress in early September may have been even more important than we thought at the time to getting things back on track.

Two important things happened during that speech:

First, the president surprised many when he made an impassioned case for the public option. Most analysts thought he would push for compromise by dropping it altogether. Instead, the public option is still very much alive today in both the House and Senate versions of the bill.

Second, Rep. Joe Wilson’s (R-SC) outburst during the speech unintentionally laid the groundwork for Democrats to go it alone by portraying his party as totally uninterested in bipartisanship. Wilson became the poster-child for obstructionism.

It’s still too early for Democrats to declare victory, but health care reform has never looked in better shape than it does right now.