The Hollywood Liberal

Bush Lawyers Likely in the Clear

A Justice Department report suggests that the possibility of legal consequence for those who broke the law is steadily waning, as Bush administration lawyers who approved the torture-interrogation technique of waterboarding will likely escape prosecution. The laughable back-up plan for disciplinary action has fallen to possible punishment by the lawyer’s respective bar associations.

The Guardian:

The Bush administration lawyers who approved the use of waterboarding and other brutal interrogation techniques are likely to escape criminal prosecution, according to a US justice department draft report.

The lawyers, at worst, face being referred to their bar associations for possible disciplinary action. This could result in a reprimand or even disbarment, ending any further legal career on the part of once high-flying government lawyers.

The justice department has been conducting an inquiry into the role of the lawyers who wrote the now infamous memos giving the go-ahead for the CIA to use waterboarding, which simulates drowning, and other techniques such as slamming detainees against false walls and prolonged sleep deprivation.

Read more

READ THE WHOLE ITEM

Related Entries

• April 14, 2009 McCain Fieldstrips His List of GOP Up-and-Comers
• April 11, 2009 Gore Vidal: ‘The Most Interesting Man in the World’
• April 7, 2009 Rapping Penis Takes Canada by Storm
• April 3, 2009 ‘Tyra’ Appearance Sparks Palin-Johnston Scuffle
• April 1, 2009 Justice Dept. Wants Stevens Conviction, Charges Dropped

D.C. Council Opens Its Eyes

The D.C. council passed a measure Tuesday to recognize same-sex marriages within the district by a 12-1 vote—with D.C. stalwart/weirdo Marion Barry casting the lone dissension. The result will likely prime the debate on legalizing same-sex marriage in D.C.

The Washington Post:

The D.C. Council overwhelmingly approved a bill yesterday to recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere, in a vote that followed a sharp exchange between an openly gay member and a civil rights champion and set off shouts of reproach from local ministers.

The council passed the measure by a vote of 12 to 1. During the debate, council member David A. Catania (I-At Large) accused Marion Barry (D-Ward 8), who cast the dissenting vote, of having taken a “bigoted” position.

After the vote, enraged African American ministers stormed the hallway outside the council chambers and vowed that they will work to oust the members who supported the bill, which was sponsored by Phil Mendelson (D-At Large). They caused such an uproar that security officers and D.C. police were called in to clear the hallway.

Read more

READ THE WHOLE ITEM

Related Entries

• April 14, 2009 McCain Fieldstrips His List of GOP Up-and-Comers
• April 11, 2009 Gore Vidal: ‘The Most Interesting Man in the World’
• April 7, 2009 Rapping Penis Takes Canada by Storm
• April 3, 2009 ‘Tyra’ Appearance Sparks Palin-Johnston Scuffle
• April 1, 2009 Justice Dept. Wants Stevens Conviction, Charges Dropped

Lane Hudson: White House Speechless on Marriage Progress
We are in the midst of a revolution. The White House and other Democrats should shed their feigned distaste for equal rights for gays. Now is the time.

AKMuckraker: Sarah Palin’s Approval Rating in Alaska is Crashing. When will the burning start?
After the last six weeks of watching the Palin train cars derail one by one, in what can only be described as agonizing political slow…

Dawn Teo: AZ GOP Top Director Arrested At Party Headquarters
PHOENIX - Just as Arizona Republican Party Chairman Randy Pullen was concluding a meeting this morning at the Arizona Republican Party headquarters, he and fellow…

Donnie Fowler: The Big Three Fight On: Cheney, Gingrich, & Limbaugh
This week, the House Republican’s #2 leader, Minority Whip Eric Cantor (Virginia) said he wants to start a national “listening tour” because he still is…

Will Holmes, Coulter, Pinkerton follow Wash. Times in retracting Obama polling falsehood?

In a May 6 editorial titled, “We Were Wrong,” The Washington Times retracted its false claim that “Americans have a lower approval of Mr. Obama at this point than all but one president since Gallup began tracking this in 1969.” The editorial read: “We hereby retract our April 28 editorial ‘Barack’s in the basement’ because we misapplied several polling comparisons of various presidents after their first 100 days in office.” Media Matters for America documented several other media figures advancing this falsehood, including CNN political contributor Amy Holmes and conservative columnist Ann Coulter, who each cited the April 28 Times editorial. Media Matters now asks: Will Holmes, Coulter, and Fox News analyst Jim Pinkerton, who also repeated a variation of the falsehood, follow The Washington Times’ example and retract the claim that President Obama’s approval rating at this point in his presidency, according to Gallup, is lower than that of most or all recent presidents?

As Media Matters documented, the falsehood is based on an apples-to-oranges comparison between an April 20-21 Gallup poll question that asked respondents to “rate the job Barack Obama has been doing as president so far — excellent, good, just okay, poor, or terrible,” and the historical results of the traditional Gallup approval rating poll question that simply asked whether respondents “approve” or “disapprove” of the president’s performance. Based on its traditional presidential approval poll question, Gallup itself reported that Obama’s average approval rating for the first quarter of his first year in office was the highest of any president since 1969 other than Jimmy Carter, and Obama’s most recent weekly average approval rating at that time was higher than the April approval ratings of every first-term president since 1969 other than Ronald Reagan.

Holmes referred to the April 28 Times editorial when she repeated the falsehood, stating that “one of the little-known facts — The Washington Times reported this last week — is that, actually, at this point in his presidency, Barack Obama is the fourth least popular of the past five presidents.” Holmes added: “You wouldn’t know that from the press coverage. And you wouldn’t know that George Bush in — you know, at this point in his presidency in 2001, after having had the recount, not even winning the popular vote, in fact had higher Gallup approvals than Barack Obama does right now.”

Echoing the falsehood on Fox News’ Hannity, Coulter did not refer to the Times by name, but she did state: “I linked to this on my Web page. He’s actually the second least popular president, 100 days in, we’ve had in 40 years.” The link on Coulter’s website went to the April 28 Times editorial and cited the editorial’s title.

From Coulter’s website, accessed at 9:08 a.m. on May 6:

Retracting its April 28 editorial, the Times wrote on May 6:

We hereby retract our April 28 editorial “Barack’s in the basement” because we misapplied several polling comparisons of various presidents after their first 100 days in office.

The point of our editorial was that various establishment media outlets were overstating President Obama’s popularity. We continue to believe that, in terms of the tone of coverage, the point is valid. However, for data establishing that point, we followed George Mason University professor Judith Apter Klinghoffer’s analysis and compared Gallup polling data for elected presidents going back to President Nixon. We did our own analysis but failed to see that some of the polls we were using did not lend themselves to direct intercomparisons.

Most importantly, we used figures for overall “approval” ratings for former President George W. Bush — 62 percent — and compared them to the ratings of “excellent” or “good” for Mr. Obama, which combined were 56 percent. However, when asked the same question — approve or disapprove — for Mr. Obama for the same three days of his first term, April 20-22, his rating actually was 65 percent, thus putting him above rather than below Mr. Bush.

In short, even if our overall figures did not compare oranges to something almost entirely different like apples, we did at least do something like comparing oranges to tangerines. But close doesn’t cut it in this business. We regret the errors.

Bush DOD Officials Mum On Using TV Military Analysts To Tout Admin Policies
So, as the New York Times has reported, the Pentagon’s Inspector General has taken the unusual step of withdrawing a report into the department’s use of retired military analysts to tout Bush administration policies on network news shows. The report,…

Chrysler Hedge Funds Denied Motion For Protection From — Anonymous Internet Commenters?
On Monday we brought you news that the Chrysler bond-holding hedge funds courageously defending the U.S. Constitution by holding out for a bigger payout in bankruptcy court were appealing to have their names sealed after receiving death threats. Blaming a…

AIG Subsidiary Explains “Timely” Decision To Pretend It Was Never Called “AIG”
“We are pleased to announce our decision to rebrand to a familiar name — VALIC,” begins a brochure titled, “Back to our roots” that was recently distributed to holders of policies with the Variable Life Insurance Company. Um, and guess…

New Republicans Still Going to the Devil
‘New Ideas’ Mitt Romney distorts American history for fun and profit… ** Actual quote from Mitt Romney babbling BS in public at the GOP-Lite National Council for a New America ‘town hall listening tour’ at a pizza place in Northern Virginia, May 2, 2009, as quoted by CNN. Brief history lesson: During the Revolutionary War the American […]

Specter’s Tough Switch
Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA), “has rapidly discovered that switching parties is not as simple as checking a new box on a voter-registration card,” the New York Times reports.

“After a week and a day as a Democrat, Mr. Specter is viewed with suspicion by his new Democratic colleagues, with general disdain by his old Republican friends, and with an odd mix of amusement and pity all around.”

“Under intense analysis of his every move and utterance, Mr. Specter canceled a scheduled appearance on Wednesday night on Larry King Live on CNN.”

CQ Politics: More losers than winners from Specter switch.

How Is it that the Wall Street Journal Editors Have Absolutely No Memory of the Last 8 Years?
They are blaming Obama for spending, after Bush’s accomplishments: a crippled economy, two failed wars and environmental crisis?

Peak-Oil Prophet James Howard Kunstler on Food, Fuel and Why He Became a Vegan
Kunstler dishes on the collapse of our institutions, why "recovery" may never come and how to survive the fall of farming as we know it.

Is a Cheney Cover-Up Scandal Brewing?
Cheney may responsible for deep-sixing an important torture memo — an act that could be a crime. Will Dems bring the truth to light?

How Is it that the Wall Street Journal Editors Have Absolutely No Memory of the Last 8 Years?
They are blaming Obama for spending, after Bush’s accomplishments: a crippled economy, two failed wars and environmental crisis?

Watershed: Peter Beinart of TIME (Former Editor of New Republic) Says It’s Time To Deal With Hamas
Check it out. Peter Beinart of Time, former editor of The New Republic, believes that it’s time to deal with Hamas. And he wrote his piece saying so before Hamas chief. Khaled Meshal, told the New York Times that he…

Netherland
As you may have heard, the President is now reading Joseph O’Neill’s Netherland, a novel about playing cricket in New York, and the American Dream, and so forth. Excellent choice, POTUS. We here at Cafe also love Netherland, and you…

Culture, Identity and Women’s Rights
It’s interesting how the paranoia surrounding communism engineered just about every policy emanating from the west at the height of the cold war. The uninhibited use of the religious radical right amidst the mujahideen groups to combat communism has…