<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Maher: 9/11 Truth Won&#8217;t Be Silenced.</title>
	<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/</link>
	<description>A Hollywood Tradition Since 2004</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Markel Winsbruck</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-279499</link>
		<author>Markel Winsbruck</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-279499</guid>
		<description>As usual, late to the party: The idea that the towers fell by virtue of aircraft is preposterous. Only a relatively scant/brief examination of the visual evidence, the evidence of the firefighters in the buildings, the survivors, and now from individuals who have assiduously collected the evidence in comprehensive form -- Steven Jones, David Griffin, and Nafeez Mossadegh (among others)... it is inescapable to accept that the buildings fell from explosives. The fact that this points to perpetrators having specific access to those buildings well in advance of the date is just another obvious conclusion one may draw. 

Bill Maher is either a giant fool (with a megaphone) or a tool with allegiance to individuals unknown. Notice one does not negate the other... fool/tool. Either way, his perspective needs to be confronted. 

To this community: If you do not support a public debate in a well-advertised public venue, particularly on television nationwide - then you really cannot call yourself a liberal -- that is a certainty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, late to the party: The idea that the towers fell by virtue of aircraft is preposterous. Only a relatively scant/brief examination of the visual evidence, the evidence of the firefighters in the buildings, the survivors, and now from individuals who have assiduously collected the evidence in comprehensive form &#8212; Steven Jones, David Griffin, and Nafeez Mossadegh (among others)&#8230; it is inescapable to accept that the buildings fell from explosives. The fact that this points to perpetrators having specific access to those buildings well in advance of the date is just another obvious conclusion one may draw. </p>
<p>Bill Maher is either a giant fool (with a megaphone) or a tool with allegiance to individuals unknown. Notice one does not negate the other&#8230; fool/tool. Either way, his perspective needs to be confronted. </p>
<p>To this community: If you do not support a public debate in a well-advertised public venue, particularly on television nationwide - then you really cannot call yourself a liberal &#8212; that is a certainty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-173412</link>
		<author>ryan</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-173412</guid>
		<description>USE YOUR BRAIN!!

IT HAS BEEN A LONG TIME SINCE I'VE READ SUCH PHENOMINAL LOGIC REGARDING 911.  I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH YOU AND HAVE BELIEVED THIS FOR MANY YEARS.  YOUR WRITING INSPIRES ME DO YOU HAVE A BLOG OR WHAT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USE YOUR BRAIN!!</p>
<p>IT HAS BEEN A LONG TIME SINCE I&#8217;VE READ SUCH PHENOMINAL LOGIC REGARDING 911.  I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH YOU AND HAVE BELIEVED THIS FOR MANY YEARS.  YOUR WRITING INSPIRES ME DO YOU HAVE A BLOG OR WHAT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-173322</link>
		<author>ryan</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 06:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-173322</guid>
		<description>Bill Maher is a complete SHMUCK.  He IS AN AROGANT EGOTIST.  F HIM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Maher is a complete SHMUCK.  He IS AN AROGANT EGOTIST.  F HIM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Use Your Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-170271</link>
		<author>Use Your Brain</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-170271</guid>
		<description>"a close look at the you’ll see that the walls were put up in a “latis” style with no real core suport( the only suport was the stair way and elevator shafts) in the center of the buildings. and i found out they were not maintained properly and they have not been up to code for some time simply stating that if on wall was compromised and any heat at all was aplied to it the whole building would come staight down, with little or no restance. And seeing how both the towers were built by the same plans it stands to reason that they both came down the same way."

Ah, no. Also what you're missing is this: There is no way in the world that the uppermost floors can crash THROUGH the remainder of SOLID building, concrete, steel, etc. as easily and quickly as falling through air. Not even close. This is a ridiculously childish idea, that "if any heat at all was applied to it the whole building would come straight down, with little or no resistance." I don't give a damn if it was made of CHEESE it would still provide more resistance than air. Any solid matter does. It's common sense. Go up on your roof and see if you magically fall THROUGH it like it isn't there. Unless you have a hole in your roof and step into it, it isn't happening. Try walking through your front door with it shut. See if it's as easy as it is walking through your doorway with the door open. Bet it's not. Use your head. Really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a close look at the you’ll see that the walls were put up in a “latis” style with no real core suport( the only suport was the stair way and elevator shafts) in the center of the buildings. and i found out they were not maintained properly and they have not been up to code for some time simply stating that if on wall was compromised and any heat at all was aplied to it the whole building would come staight down, with little or no restance. And seeing how both the towers were built by the same plans it stands to reason that they both came down the same way.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, no. Also what you&#8217;re missing is this: There is no way in the world that the uppermost floors can crash THROUGH the remainder of SOLID building, concrete, steel, etc. as easily and quickly as falling through air. Not even close. This is a ridiculously childish idea, that &#8220;if any heat at all was applied to it the whole building would come straight down, with little or no resistance.&#8221; I don&#8217;t give a damn if it was made of CHEESE it would still provide more resistance than air. Any solid matter does. It&#8217;s common sense. Go up on your roof and see if you magically fall THROUGH it like it isn&#8217;t there. Unless you have a hole in your roof and step into it, it isn&#8217;t happening. Try walking through your front door with it shut. See if it&#8217;s as easy as it is walking through your doorway with the door open. Bet it&#8217;s not. Use your head. Really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-135640</link>
		<author>Ron Paul</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 18:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-135640</guid>
		<description>You make 'em, I amuse 'em.TheodorSeussGeiselTheodor Seuss Geisel, a.k.a. Dr. Seuss, 1904-1991, on children</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make &#8216;em, I amuse &#8216;em.TheodorSeussGeiselTheodor Seuss Geisel, a.k.a. Dr. Seuss, 1904-1991, on children</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-74195</link>
		<author>Ghost Walker</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 05:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-74195</guid>
		<description>got to doing some digging on the blue prints on the towers., and if a person was to take a close look at the you'll see that the walls were put up in a "latis" style with no real core suport( the only suport was the stair way and elevator shafts) in the center of the buildings. and i found out  they were not maintained properly and they have not been up to code for some time simply stating that if on wall was compromised and any heat at all was aplied to it the whole building would come staight down, with little or no restance. And seeing how both the towers were built by the same plans it stands to reason that they both came down the same way.

As for building #7 well--- that one was almost certain to be a demo charge

and as for the pentagone all the pics i have show no plane or parts of the plane in the building and i don't think that the goverment can get a plane of that size out before the fire trucks got there. i Don't believe they are that good ! 
i i can only come to the conclusion that both sides of the story are right ,but i could be mistaken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>got to doing some digging on the blue prints on the towers., and if a person was to take a close look at the you&#8217;ll see that the walls were put up in a &#8220;latis&#8221; style with no real core suport( the only suport was the stair way and elevator shafts) in the center of the buildings. and i found out  they were not maintained properly and they have not been up to code for some time simply stating that if on wall was compromised and any heat at all was aplied to it the whole building would come staight down, with little or no restance. And seeing how both the towers were built by the same plans it stands to reason that they both came down the same way.</p>
<p>As for building #7 well&#8212; that one was almost certain to be a demo charge</p>
<p>and as for the pentagone all the pics i have show no plane or parts of the plane in the building and i don&#8217;t think that the goverment can get a plane of that size out before the fire trucks got there. i Don&#8217;t believe they are that good !<br />
i i can only come to the conclusion that both sides of the story are right ,but i could be mistaken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Use Your Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-70972</link>
		<author>Use Your Brain</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-70972</guid>
		<description>HL: Thanks, I've gathered that this blog is one of EXCEEDINGLY few blogs out there that are genuinely leftist and don't pull any punches. This one, Brad Blog, Winter Patriot, and that's about it. Thank you guys for being genuine and having the balls to take on the unpleasant issues.

Pat: I KNOW that you said we are "probably" right. Though unless you think the laws of physics are subjective, there is no "probably" to it, however my problem with you is not that, but that you are so ready to roll over and let the establisment rape you again. You ask about the solution but by your attitude you make yourself part of the problem. What's the solution? There is no magic wand quick-fix solution, that's obvious but that doesn't mean that we don't have any options whatsoever. The most important thing we can do first is to educate. Spread the word. Tell everyone you know that 9/11 was an inside job. Post comments on blogs until you get banned, that's what I do. Getting the truth out there into public discourse is the first most important thing we must do. So far it seems to be working, as by the latest Zogby poll 51% of Americans now want a REAL investigation into 9/11, one that investigates Cheney and Bush for complicity. So we are having an effect. It would be a whole lot easier if we actually had a genuine opposition party in this country instead of the worthless Democratic Party who are working for the establishment and serve as nothing but a fig leaf for the regime, basically what Putin does in Russia only he's not as sophisticated about it. But we are working on it. Every day more and more people wake up and realize that 9/11 and the "war on terror" are fake. Why is this so important? Because the more people that know the truth about 9/11, the less likely it will be that the regime will try to carry out ANOTHER false flag attack to be blamed on "Al Qaeda". Sorry if I can't whip up a solution that will solve everything before the commercial break, I know this is a sound-bite society that has to have things decided in 30 seconds or they lose interest. I reiterate: Spreading the word is the key first step. Everything else that CAN happen will flow from that, whether it is arresting the guilty parties, having a genuine independent investigation, turning our backs on the mainstream media, or whatever. The more people that know the truth, the better, and the less likely it will be that the bastards will try something similar again. Like before the '08 "election". The people I was referring to that have shit for brains are the people who can't seem to figure out that solid buildings offer many magnitudes more resistance than air. An autistic 10 year old should be able to deduce that Pat. So yes, if you are someone who can't use common sense and figure out that solid things offer much more resistance than air, you have shit for brains. If the shoe fits, as they say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HL: Thanks, I&#8217;ve gathered that this blog is one of EXCEEDINGLY few blogs out there that are genuinely leftist and don&#8217;t pull any punches. This one, Brad Blog, Winter Patriot, and that&#8217;s about it. Thank you guys for being genuine and having the balls to take on the unpleasant issues.</p>
<p>Pat: I KNOW that you said we are &#8220;probably&#8221; right. Though unless you think the laws of physics are subjective, there is no &#8220;probably&#8221; to it, however my problem with you is not that, but that you are so ready to roll over and let the establisment rape you again. You ask about the solution but by your attitude you make yourself part of the problem. What&#8217;s the solution? There is no magic wand quick-fix solution, that&#8217;s obvious but that doesn&#8217;t mean that we don&#8217;t have any options whatsoever. The most important thing we can do first is to educate. Spread the word. Tell everyone you know that 9/11 was an inside job. Post comments on blogs until you get banned, that&#8217;s what I do. Getting the truth out there into public discourse is the first most important thing we must do. So far it seems to be working, as by the latest Zogby poll 51% of Americans now want a REAL investigation into 9/11, one that investigates Cheney and Bush for complicity. So we are having an effect. It would be a whole lot easier if we actually had a genuine opposition party in this country instead of the worthless Democratic Party who are working for the establishment and serve as nothing but a fig leaf for the regime, basically what Putin does in Russia only he&#8217;s not as sophisticated about it. But we are working on it. Every day more and more people wake up and realize that 9/11 and the &#8220;war on terror&#8221; are fake. Why is this so important? Because the more people that know the truth about 9/11, the less likely it will be that the regime will try to carry out ANOTHER false flag attack to be blamed on &#8220;Al Qaeda&#8221;. Sorry if I can&#8217;t whip up a solution that will solve everything before the commercial break, I know this is a sound-bite society that has to have things decided in 30 seconds or they lose interest. I reiterate: Spreading the word is the key first step. Everything else that CAN happen will flow from that, whether it is arresting the guilty parties, having a genuine independent investigation, turning our backs on the mainstream media, or whatever. The more people that know the truth, the better, and the less likely it will be that the bastards will try something similar again. Like before the &#8216;08 &#8220;election&#8221;. The people I was referring to that have shit for brains are the people who can&#8217;t seem to figure out that solid buildings offer many magnitudes more resistance than air. An autistic 10 year old should be able to deduce that Pat. So yes, if you are someone who can&#8217;t use common sense and figure out that solid things offer much more resistance than air, you have shit for brains. If the shoe fits, as they say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-70689</link>
		<author>pat</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-70689</guid>
		<description>Hey "Use Your Brain" I've reviewed the evidence on both sides for and against your theory... and you need to use your brain for a quick second if it doesn't hurt you. I agreed with you dumbass. I said more than likely you're probably right. Here's the thing... SO WHAT? Oh my God you figured out who to blame for the whole thing... now what? What are you going to do about it? The American Government doesn't care... is the FBI knocking at your door trying to shut you up because you figured it out? No, they don't care... nor are they ever going to. So why don't you answer the harder question that i asked which is "What is your solution?" I'm so sick of listening to people argue about who is to blame. Here are some hard facts for you 1) it happened 2) We have not progressed since that day because we are still trying to figure out who to blame 3)We invaded Iraq and Afghanistan 4) Bush got his war on terror... 5) The Government has Nukes, biological weaponry, a highly organized military, Expensive Aircraft, and Intelligence reports... and under this administration have managed to strip the american publics rights without them even knowing it. So what can we do to stop them? they can screw with us anytime they want and they have proven it more so in the past 6 years. So please stop trying to figure out who to blame, think outside the box, use your brain, and come up with the solution... cause the rest of us who have "shit for brains" can't think as fast or as well as you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8220;Use Your Brain&#8221; I&#8217;ve reviewed the evidence on both sides for and against your theory&#8230; and you need to use your brain for a quick second if it doesn&#8217;t hurt you. I agreed with you dumbass. I said more than likely you&#8217;re probably right. Here&#8217;s the thing&#8230; SO WHAT? Oh my God you figured out who to blame for the whole thing&#8230; now what? What are you going to do about it? The American Government doesn&#8217;t care&#8230; is the FBI knocking at your door trying to shut you up because you figured it out? No, they don&#8217;t care&#8230; nor are they ever going to. So why don&#8217;t you answer the harder question that i asked which is &#8220;What is your solution?&#8221; I&#8217;m so sick of listening to people argue about who is to blame. Here are some hard facts for you 1) it happened 2) We have not progressed since that day because we are still trying to figure out who to blame 3)We invaded Iraq and Afghanistan 4) Bush got his war on terror&#8230; 5) The Government has Nukes, biological weaponry, a highly organized military, Expensive Aircraft, and Intelligence reports&#8230; and under this administration have managed to strip the american publics rights without them even knowing it. So what can we do to stop them? they can screw with us anytime they want and they have proven it more so in the past 6 years. So please stop trying to figure out who to blame, think outside the box, use your brain, and come up with the solution&#8230; cause the rest of us who have &#8220;shit for brains&#8221; can&#8217;t think as fast or as well as you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HL</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-70398</link>
		<author>HL</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-70398</guid>
		<description>Use your brain: At least you know you got the HL We have no safe parameters here. So all the people who read/watch/listen to the people listed above. forget them, stay with us. Thank You</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use your brain: At least you know you got the HL We have no safe parameters here. So all the people who read/watch/listen to the people listed above. forget them, stay with us. Thank You</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Use Your Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-70239</link>
		<author>Use Your Brain</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-70239</guid>
		<description>Bill Maher is a left gatekeeper piece of shit. Just like Amy Goodman, Michael Moore, Noam Chomsky, Keith Olbermann, Dan Abrams, Chris Matthews, Geraldo Rivera, Jon Stewart, Alan Colmes, Katie Couric, Alexander Cockburn, William Blum, Matt Tabbi etc. 

In the blogosphere you have a similar phenomenon of left gatekeeper blogs, such as Daily Kos, MyDD, Democratic Underground, My Left Wing, Mother Jones, Huffington Post, Salon, The Nation, Moxie Grrrl, Crooks &#38; Liars etc.

It's all about discourse control. Keeping the discussion within "safe" parameters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Maher is a left gatekeeper piece of shit. Just like Amy Goodman, Michael Moore, Noam Chomsky, Keith Olbermann, Dan Abrams, Chris Matthews, Geraldo Rivera, Jon Stewart, Alan Colmes, Katie Couric, Alexander Cockburn, William Blum, Matt Tabbi etc. </p>
<p>In the blogosphere you have a similar phenomenon of left gatekeeper blogs, such as Daily Kos, MyDD, Democratic Underground, My Left Wing, Mother Jones, Huffington Post, Salon, The Nation, Moxie Grrrl, Crooks &amp; Liars etc.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about discourse control. Keeping the discussion within &#8220;safe&#8221; parameters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Use Your Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-70232</link>
		<author>Use Your Brain</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-70232</guid>
		<description>Pat said: "Did the US government stage the 9/11 attacks? who knows?"

Hey Pat-- Can a solid building provide as little resistance to a falling mass as air? Who knows? Only people who don't have shit for brains. I will make this very simple for you: In order for the uppermost part of a building to be able to "fall" into and through the remaining solid vast majority of the building as quickly (easily) as falling through air, SOMETHING (like explosives) had to have reduced said majority of building to such a non-resisting state. Can you follow this? Is this too complicated for you? Here's a little test. Try walking through your front door with it closed and see if you can pass through it as easily as you can with it open. Bet you can't. For the life of me I can't see WHAT THE HELL is so damned difficult to understand about this concept. Solid things offer enormously more resistance than air. It is beyond physics, just simple common sense. Can you use common sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat said: &#8220;Did the US government stage the 9/11 attacks? who knows?&#8221;</p>
<p>Hey Pat&#8211; Can a solid building provide as little resistance to a falling mass as air? Who knows? Only people who don&#8217;t have shit for brains. I will make this very simple for you: In order for the uppermost part of a building to be able to &#8220;fall&#8221; into and through the remaining solid vast majority of the building as quickly (easily) as falling through air, SOMETHING (like explosives) had to have reduced said majority of building to such a non-resisting state. Can you follow this? Is this too complicated for you? Here&#8217;s a little test. Try walking through your front door with it closed and see if you can pass through it as easily as you can with it open. Bet you can&#8217;t. For the life of me I can&#8217;t see WHAT THE HELL is so damned difficult to understand about this concept. Solid things offer enormously more resistance than air. It is beyond physics, just simple common sense. Can you use common sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Use Your Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-70217</link>
		<author>Use Your Brain</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/10/20/bill-maher-911-truth-wont-be-silenced/#comment-70217</guid>
		<description>Anon: What did they have to gain? A custom-made pretext, that's what. Do you think they would have been able to invade Afghanistan in October 2001 WITHOUT 9/11? Do you think they would have been able to invade Afghanistan if they were honest about the reason WHY they wanted to invade? Most Americans would not have gone along with an invasion of Afghanistan to be able to build a natural gas pipeline from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Pakistan and a LNG port; but most of them eagerly backed the invasion of Afghanistan after the 9/11 false flag operation. 


While the negotiations with the Taliban were still ongoing, the Cheney regime tried to bribe the Taliban with $43 million in aid, in addition to other aid already earmarked for Afghanistan: "The sum brings U.S. assistance to $124.2 million for this year, making the United States the largest Afghan donor for the second year in a row."                                                                                                       http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/05/17/us.afghanistan.aid/


Christine Rocca was sent in August 2001 to try to get the Taliban to soften its demands, to no avail: "During her stay in Pakistan, Rocca is also expected to meet Taliban officials."                                                                                                 http://iys.cidi.org/humanitarian/irin/casia/01b/ixl4.html  


A little earlier that summer the U.S. had threatened the Taliban with war if they refuse to agree to the U.S.'s terms: ''At one moment during the negotiations, the U.S. representatives told the Taliban, 'either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs','' Brisard said in an interview in Paris."                                                                                 http://archive.democrats.com/view.cfm?id=5166
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0201/08/ltm.05.html


The Taliban of course did not back down, so the U.S. resorted to its 9/11 false flag operation to be blamed on "Al Qaeda" to use as a pretext to invade Afghanistan which was widely believed to be harboring "Al Qaeda". The Taliban is overthrown and a pro-U.S. puppet government is installed with Hamid Karzai at the helm. Karzai, though he denies it, is alleged to be a former consultant for Unocal: "Cool and worldly, Karzai is a former employee of US oil company Unocal – one of two main oil companies that was bidding for the lucrative contract to build an oil pipeline from Uzbekistan through Afghanistan to seaports in Pakistan"                    http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0610/p01s03e-wosc.html      


Whether or not Karzai used to be on Unocal's payroll or that of one of its subsidiaries, it is indisputable that the real power broker in Afghanistan, the (then-) U.S. ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad, used to be a Unocal consultant: "The ambassador once worked as an adviser to oil giant Unocal and his detractors linked his oil industry ties to his appointment to Iraq. They also noted that at the same time that he was working for Unocal, the company was touting for business in Taleban-run Afghanistan." http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4736394.stm  


The parliament itself, or loya jirga as it is called, is really just a rubber stamp for the U.S.'s policies in Afghanistan, one of the cabinet ministers even being quoted as saying it was a rubber stamp: "Seema Samar, the women's affairs minister, complained that the loya jirga was "not a democracy; it is a rubber stamp - everything has already been decided by the powerful ones".    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2039665.stm
 

So Karzai and the other puppets got to work hammering out a deal with the interests of their U.S. puppetmasters in mind, and in May 2002 it was announced that "Afghanistan" was planning a gas pipeline: "Afghanistan hopes to strike a deal later this month to build a $2bn pipeline through the country to take gas from energy-rich Turkmenistan to Pakistan and India. Afghan interim ruler Hamid Karzai is to hold talks with his Pakistani and Turkmenistan counterparts later this month on Afghanistan's biggest foreign investment project, said Mohammad Alim Razim, minister for Mines and Industries told Reuters. "The work on the project will start after an agreement is expected to be struck at the coming summit," Mr Razim said. The construction of the 850-kilometre pipeline had been previously discussed between Afghanistan's former Taliban regime, US oil company Unocal and Bridas of Argentina."                                                                       http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/1984459.stm


Later that month at the summit, sure enough, the pipeline plan was given the green light: "The leaders of Afghanistan, Pakistan and Turkmenistan have agreed to construct a $2bn pipeline to bring gas from Central Asia to the sub-continent. The project was abandoned in 1998 when a consortium led by US energy company Unocal withdrew from the project over fears of being seen to support Afghanistan's then Taliban government...  The Pakistani leader said once the project is completed, Central Asia's hydrocarbon resources would be available to the international market, including East Asian and other far eastern countries. Pakistan has plans to build a liquid-gas plant at the Gwadar port for export purposes...  The pipeline could eventually supply gas to India."                                                                              http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/2017044.stm


A few months later, in December 2002, the pipeline deal was signed, just a little over a year after 9/11, the event that made it possible: "An agreement has been signed in the Turkmen capital, Ashgabat, paving the way for construction of a gas pipeline from the Central Asian republic through Afghanistan to Pakistan. The building of the trans-Afghanistan pipeline has been under discussion for some years but plans have been held up by Afghanistan's unstable political situation... With improved regional security after the fall of the Taleban about a year ago, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan and Pakistan have decided to push ahead with plans for the ambitious 1,500-kilometre-long gas pipeline...  Turkmenistan has some of the world's greatest reserves of natural gas, but still relies on tightly controlled Russian pipelines to export it. Ashgabat has long been desperate to find an alternative export route."                                                                         http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2608713.stm  

Are you aware that Bush had warplans for the invasion of Afghanistan complete and on his desk, ready for signing, two days BEFORE 9/11? 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4587368/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4585010/ 

And even the USA Today admitted that an invasion of Afghanistan wouldn't have been politically feasible without 9/11:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-03-23-war-analysis_x.htm 


And aside from Afghanistan, they of course used 9/11 as one of their excuses for invading Iraq, and it's unlikely the regime could have scared most Americans into supporting the Iraq invasion without 9/11. You see Anon, the "war on terror" is nothing more than a thinly-disguised war for as much American control over as much of the world's remaining oil and natural gas resources as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon: What did they have to gain? A custom-made pretext, that&#8217;s what. Do you think they would have been able to invade Afghanistan in October 2001 WITHOUT 9/11? Do you think they would have been able to invade Afghanistan if they were honest about the reason WHY they wanted to invade? Most Americans would not have gone along with an invasion of Afghanistan to be able to build a natural gas pipeline from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Pakistan and a LNG port; but most of them eagerly backed the invasion of Afghanistan after the 9/11 false flag operation. </p>
<p>While the negotiations with the Taliban were still ongoing, the Cheney regime tried to bribe the Taliban with $43 million in aid, in addition to other aid already earmarked for Afghanistan: &#8220;The sum brings U.S. assistance to $124.2 million for this year, making the United States the largest Afghan donor for the second year in a row.&#8221;                                                                                                       <a href="http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/05/17/us.afghanistan.aid/" rel="nofollow">http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/05/17/us.afghanistan.aid/</a></p>
<p>Christine Rocca was sent in August 2001 to try to get the Taliban to soften its demands, to no avail: &#8220;During her stay in Pakistan, Rocca is also expected to meet Taliban officials.&#8221;                                                                                                 <a href="http://iys.cidi.org/humanitarian/irin/casia/01b/ixl4.html" rel="nofollow">http://iys.cidi.org/humanitarian/irin/casia/01b/ixl4.html</a>  </p>
<p>A little earlier that summer the U.S. had threatened the Taliban with war if they refuse to agree to the U.S.&#8217;s terms: &#8221;At one moment during the negotiations, the U.S. representatives told the Taliban, &#8216;either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs&#8217;,&#8221; Brisard said in an interview in Paris.&#8221;                                                                                 <a href="http://archive.democrats.com/view.cfm?id=5166" rel="nofollow">http://archive.democrats.com/view.cfm?id=5166</a><br />
<a href="http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0201/08/ltm.05.html" rel="nofollow">http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0201/08/ltm.05.html</a></p>
<p>The Taliban of course did not back down, so the U.S. resorted to its 9/11 false flag operation to be blamed on &#8220;Al Qaeda&#8221; to use as a pretext to invade Afghanistan which was widely believed to be harboring &#8220;Al Qaeda&#8221;. The Taliban is overthrown and a pro-U.S. puppet government is installed with Hamid Karzai at the helm. Karzai, though he denies it, is alleged to be a former consultant for Unocal: &#8220;Cool and worldly, Karzai is a former employee of US oil company Unocal – one of two main oil companies that was bidding for the lucrative contract to build an oil pipeline from Uzbekistan through Afghanistan to seaports in Pakistan&#8221;                    <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0610/p01s03e-wosc.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0610/p01s03e-wosc.html</a>      </p>
<p>Whether or not Karzai used to be on Unocal&#8217;s payroll or that of one of its subsidiaries, it is indisputable that the real power broker in Afghanistan, the (then-) U.S. ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad, used to be a Unocal consultant: &#8220;The ambassador once worked as an adviser to oil giant Unocal and his detractors linked his oil industry ties to his appointment to Iraq. They also noted that at the same time that he was working for Unocal, the company was touting for business in Taleban-run Afghanistan.&#8221; <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4736394.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4736394.stm</a>  </p>
<p>The parliament itself, or loya jirga as it is called, is really just a rubber stamp for the U.S.&#8217;s policies in Afghanistan, one of the cabinet ministers even being quoted as saying it was a rubber stamp: &#8220;Seema Samar, the women&#8217;s affairs minister, complained that the loya jirga was &#8220;not a democracy; it is a rubber stamp - everything has already been decided by the powerful ones&#8221;.    <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2039665.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2039665.stm</a></p>
<p>So Karzai and the other puppets got to work hammering out a deal with the interests of their U.S. puppetmasters in mind, and in May 2002 it was announced that &#8220;Afghanistan&#8221; was planning a gas pipeline: &#8220;Afghanistan hopes to strike a deal later this month to build a $2bn pipeline through the country to take gas from energy-rich Turkmenistan to Pakistan and India. Afghan interim ruler Hamid Karzai is to hold talks with his Pakistani and Turkmenistan counterparts later this month on Afghanistan&#8217;s biggest foreign investment project, said Mohammad Alim Razim, minister for Mines and Industries told Reuters. &#8220;The work on the project will start after an agreement is expected to be struck at the coming summit,&#8221; Mr Razim said. The construction of the 850-kilometre pipeline had been previously discussed between Afghanistan&#8217;s former Taliban regime, US oil company Unocal and Bridas of Argentina.&#8221;                                                                       <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/1984459.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/1984459.stm</a></p>
<p>Later that month at the summit, sure enough, the pipeline plan was given the green light: &#8220;The leaders of Afghanistan, Pakistan and Turkmenistan have agreed to construct a $2bn pipeline to bring gas from Central Asia to the sub-continent. The project was abandoned in 1998 when a consortium led by US energy company Unocal withdrew from the project over fears of being seen to support Afghanistan&#8217;s then Taliban government&#8230;  The Pakistani leader said once the project is completed, Central Asia&#8217;s hydrocarbon resources would be available to the international market, including East Asian and other far eastern countries. Pakistan has plans to build a liquid-gas plant at the Gwadar port for export purposes&#8230;  The pipeline could eventually supply gas to India.&#8221;                                                                              <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/2017044.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/2017044.stm</a></p>
<p>A few months later, in December 2002, the pipeline deal was signed, just a little over a year after 9/11, the event that made it possible: &#8220;An agreement has been signed in the Turkmen capital, Ashgabat, paving the way for construction of a gas pipeline from the Central Asian republic through Afghanistan to Pakistan. The building of the trans-Afghanistan pipeline has been under discussion for some years but plans have been held up by Afghanistan&#8217;s unstable political situation&#8230; With improved regional security after the fall of the Taleban about a year ago, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan and Pakistan have decided to push ahead with plans for the ambitious 1,500-kilometre-long gas pipeline&#8230;  Turkmenistan has some of the world&#8217;s greatest reserves of natural gas, but still relies on tightly controlled Russian pipelines to export it. Ashgabat has long been desperate to find an alternative export route.&#8221;                                                                         <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2608713.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2608713.stm</a>  </p>
<p>Are you aware that Bush had warplans for the invasion of Afghanistan complete and on his desk, ready for signing, two days BEFORE 9/11?<br />
<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4587368/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4587368/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4585010/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4585010/</a> </p>
<p>And even the USA Today admitted that an invasion of Afghanistan wouldn&#8217;t have been politically feasible without 9/11:<br />
<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-03-23-war-analysis_x.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-03-23-war-analysis_x.htm</a> </p>
<p>And aside from Afghanistan, they of course used 9/11 as one of their excuses for invading Iraq, and it&#8217;s unlikely the regime could have scared most Americans into supporting the Iraq invasion without 9/11. You see Anon, the &#8220;war on terror&#8221; is nothing more than a thinly-disguised war for as much American control over as much of the world&#8217;s remaining oil and natural gas resources as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

