<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush to Kids on Health Care: Drop Dead</title>
	<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/</link>
	<description>A Hollywood Tradition Since 2004</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: HL</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65926</link>
		<author>HL</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65926</guid>
		<description>This is from the article you linked to

&lt;strong&gt;The claim: The proposal would allow coverage of families earning $83,000.

The facts: The bill essentially sets an income ceiling of three times the poverty rate for a family of four -- $61,950. Beyond that, the federal government would not pay a state its full SCHIP match, which averages about 70 percent. &lt;/strong&gt;

Believe it or not $61,350 is not a lot of money for a family of 4 to live on. It's barely over $15,000 per person per year, that is just about the poverty level. If a family making that kind of money had good health insurance they would not have to take advantage of the SCHIP plan. If both parents are working and making just over 30K, their health plans probably suck, if they have one at all. So the bill would help those families out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is from the article you linked to</p>
<p><strong>The claim: The proposal would allow coverage of families earning $83,000.</p>
<p>The facts: The bill essentially sets an income ceiling of three times the poverty rate for a family of four &#8212; $61,950. Beyond that, the federal government would not pay a state its full SCHIP match, which averages about 70 percent. </strong></p>
<p>Believe it or not $61,350 is not a lot of money for a family of 4 to live on. It&#8217;s barely over $15,000 per person per year, that is just about the poverty level. If a family making that kind of money had good health insurance they would not have to take advantage of the SCHIP plan. If both parents are working and making just over 30K, their health plans probably suck, if they have one at all. So the bill would help those families out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65613</link>
		<author>Ghost Walker</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 06:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65613</guid>
		<description>HL once again you are wrong. What William G told you wasn't a lie. Here it is from CBS News, The Bush administration says the legislation could qualify some New York families of four making about $83,000 a year, or four times the poverty level.
 Not to mention HL that the tax increase on tobacco with affect the poor since more poor and lower class income smoke than higher income.
http://www.startribune.com/587/story/1448376.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HL once again you are wrong. What William G told you wasn&#8217;t a lie. Here it is from CBS News, The Bush administration says the legislation could qualify some New York families of four making about $83,000 a year, or four times the poverty level.<br />
 Not to mention HL that the tax increase on tobacco with affect the poor since more poor and lower class income smoke than higher income.<br />
<a href="http://www.startribune.com/587/story/1448376.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.startribune.com/587/story/1448376.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urgent News Trackers</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65439</link>
		<author>Urgent News Trackers</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65439</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Urgent News Trackers...&lt;/strong&gt;

The latest updates regarding health and general news...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Urgent News Trackers&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The latest updates regarding health and general news&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65427</link>
		<author>Ghost Walker</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 18:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65427</guid>
		<description>what i find kinda funny bout this fight over children's health care is that it is aready in place. I had it when i was a kid. My family lived on $13K a year in 1989 and all us kids (there was 5 of us) had free health care. This Children's health care package is the first step to a natonal health care, that means that you HL would be respondsable for paying the taxes that pay for my daughter. I don't think that is fair to you, after all, is not my little girl my responsibility?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what i find kinda funny bout this fight over children&#8217;s health care is that it is aready in place. I had it when i was a kid. My family lived on $13K a year in 1989 and all us kids (there was 5 of us) had free health care. This Children&#8217;s health care package is the first step to a natonal health care, that means that you HL would be respondsable for paying the taxes that pay for my daughter. I don&#8217;t think that is fair to you, after all, is not my little girl my responsibility?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HL</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65407</link>
		<author>HL</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65407</guid>
		<description>So it is a lie then. Savage (whose real name is Weiner by the way) is the biggest douchebag on radio. Don't be coming on here with those lies anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it is a lie then. Savage (whose real name is Weiner by the way) is the biggest douchebag on radio. Don&#8217;t be coming on here with those lies anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William G</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65364</link>
		<author>William G</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 06:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65364</guid>
		<description>I heard it on Michael Savage and Mark Levins show</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard it on Michael Savage and Mark Levins show</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65329</link>
		<author>Paul</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65329</guid>
		<description>"I hope Bush vetoes this"

I do to.

It makes the GOP look even more divided...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I hope Bush vetoes this&#8221;</p>
<p>I do to.</p>
<p>It makes the GOP look even more divided&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HL</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65256</link>
		<author>HL</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65256</guid>
		<description>where is your source on this info. Or are you making stuff up again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where is your source on this info. Or are you making stuff up again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William G</title>
		<link>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65097</link>
		<author>William G</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/2007/09/27/bush-to-kids-on-health-care-drop-dead/#comment-65097</guid>
		<description>As usual you are cherrypicking information. This SCHIP bill is taking away more of my money. Did you know that families making 82,000 a year which is 400 percent over the povertyy line would be covered. Show me where in the constitution where it says that healthcare should be socialized. I hope Bush vetoes this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual you are cherrypicking information. This SCHIP bill is taking away more of my money. Did you know that families making 82,000 a year which is 400 percent over the povertyy line would be covered. Show me where in the constitution where it says that healthcare should be socialized. I hope Bush vetoes this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
