We are the Liberal Blog From Hollywood
L.A.'s Premier Post Facility

L.A.'s Premier Post Facility

Photographer in L.A.

Hot Pics & Gossip.

Judith Nathan, Or Bill Clinton

Posted in H.L. News, Main Blog (All Posts) on March 30th, 2007 6:41 am by HL

Who Would You Rather Have Sit in on a Cabinet Meeting?

Talk Left.com
Excerpt:
Rudy Giuliani says his wife Judith Nathan would be welcome to sit in on cabinet and policy meetings if he were elected President.

How typical of his absolute arrogance.

If Hillary gets elected, we'd have Bill Clinton either sitting in on meetings or being Ambassador to the world.

Hillary Clinton says many people want her to appoint her husband secretary of State if she wins. Such nepotism was outlawed after John Kennedy made his brother Bobby attorney general, she noted at the fundraiser.

Then she added, to huge cheers, “But I sure can make him ambassador to the world!” That is a role the former president already is playing, mostly through the William Jefferson Clinton Foundation.

How is this even a close call?

7 Responses to “Judith Nathan, Or Bill Clinton”

  1. Bill Says:

    HL why would we vote Hillary in for President knowing that slick willie would be back. He couldn’t do a thing right when he was there the last time and his wife is no better.
    Thanks to him we are in Iraq right now. He didn’t handle the problem when it started and Bush ended up with it.
    “If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.”
    –President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

    Nancy Pelosi agreed: “Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”
    -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

    The policy to remove Saddam Hussein was not left over from the first Bush administration, but, rather, unfinished business from the Clinton administration. Upon entering office in January of 2001, President Bush inherited from the Clinton administration a policy of regime change. That policy was based upon the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act (P.L. 105-338), which stated, “It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime.” This policy was unanimously approved by the Senate and strongly supported by the Clinton administration.

    Not two months after he signed the Iraq Liberation Act into law, President Clinton delivered an address to the nation explaining his decision to order air strikes against Iraqi military targets. He discussed the potential long-term threat posed by Saddam Hussein, stating,

    “The hard fact is that so long as Saddam Hussein remains in power, he threatens the well- being of his people, the peace of his region, the security of the world. The best way to end that threat once and for all is with the new Iraqi government, a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people.

    “. . . Heavy as they are, the costs of inaction must be weighed against the price of inaction. If Saddam defies the world and we fail to respond, we will face a far greater threat in the future. Saddam will strike again at his neighbors; he will make war on his own people. And mark my words, he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them.”
    The words, again, of President Clinton. It is hard to think of any Bush administration words more forceful, unqualified or expressive of the grave and growing danger posed by the Iraqi regime. Yet, I’ve heard no criticism of Clinton administration misuse of intelligence.

    How can one administration’s use of intelligence be reasonable and credible, but another administration’s use of the same intelligence be an unreasonable lie?

    Now try lieing your Liberal way out of this one HL since all of this is public record and can be found anywere.
    Guess it does go back to Clinton screwing up. So tell me why would we want another Clinton in office screwing things up worse.
    Guess that makes Clinton the worst President because he could handle the job himself.
    Oh yeah you want the web site. theanchoressonline.com/2005/11/02/where-did-the-wmd-intel-come-from/

  2. H.L. Says:

    “HL why would we vote Hillary in for President knowing that slick willie would be back. He couldn’t do a thing right when he was there”

    Couldn’t do a thing right? Now I know you are an looney bastard.
    How about 8 years of peace and prosperity, no I guess you think war and debt are a better way to live. Please, this country never had it so good when Bill was President. Companies were competing with each other to hire people, and having bidding wars for even normal type jobs because there were so many around. You got to be kidding me. Oh and by the way dude, if Gore had been allowed to take the office he won. 9/11 would not have happened, neither would Afghanistan, Iraq, or any of the other hundreds of corrupt scandals that have occurred since Bush was installed. Now go ahead and leave me some long winded BS response.

  3. Bill Says:

    Poor HL. You call me a looney bastard. When did we have 8 years of peace and prosperity with good ole slick willie. I guess you for got about the bombing or the USS Cole and maybe the Embassy’s. Oh that’s right none of that happened while good ole Bill was in office.
    As for 8 years of prosperity, try again. Here this is straight from the clintonmemoriallibrary.com
    Government became larger and Americans payed more to the government than ever before in history. We had the largest budget and greatest tax burden in the history of our Republic.
    Bureaucrats and special interests controled more of our lives than ever before.
    Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid was robbed to make the deficit appear lower and to pay for programs they were never intended to fund.
    The Federal Debt continued to rise at an alarming rate and is costing more to service the interest on the debt.
    Family incomes stagnated and real wages fell.
    More people are working because more households have to increasingly rely on both the husband and wife working in order to make ends meet.
    Personal debt, bankruptcies and deliquencies increased. A record number of Americans filed bankruptcy before the government shut off that debt escape.
    The National Federation of Independent Business described Clinton’s 1993 tax increase as, “About as anti-small business as you could ever see.”
    America’s merchandise trade deficit for goods and services increased 176 percent between 1992 and 1995. (source: Council of Economic Advisers, Economic Indicators, 6/96). In 1999, the trade deficit hit a historic high of $168,500,000.00. That’s 168 1/2 BILLION dollars!
    Attempts were made by the Clinton Whitehouse to ‘nationalize’ or take over 1/7th. of our economy in a failed National Health Insurance coup.
    In league with a select group of attorneys, health care providers, and the Federal government, the state’s Attorneys General’s raised taxes on the lower and middle classes.
    Right HL that sounds like 8 years of peace and prosperity. Think it’s about time you laided off the crack pipe and started paying attention to the real world and stop living in your hollywood dream.

  4. Buck Says:

    H.L. You are wrong for taking down my post! That just shows me you know I got the the ol’ stinkaroo list on America’s scandalous odd couple the Clintoons. H.L., them worthless Clintoons are like a pair of political camelians that change their colors like the prevailing winds!

    Hillary Jong IL is on the move in America folks! Be ready.

  5. HL Says:

    Buck, You say that Clinton was the worst president ever, there is no way that is true and I will not allow you to lie on this site like that. So down it came (again)

  6. Bill Says:

    Buck all you have to do to see that good ole slick willie was crooked is goto the website I put on here and you will see everything that good ole bill has been in and what happen.
    The second Pres to be impeached and if Hillary gets there she will be the third. Because the Democrats aren’t going to and can’t impeach George. As I posted before HL if they could they would have done it a long time ago. And since they haven’t than that means that they don’t have anything to Impeach Bush on. Aint that a bit*h how that works.

  7. Buck Says:

    Bill, H.L. cant stand it that I have the goods on the Clintons. Im not talking just bad mouthing, Im talking the real McCoy stink list. He knows I did not lie. Every screw up under the sun that Mr Clinton and his boss have been so sorry to commit I HAVE IT!

    H.L., as I said they were not lies. I challenge you on the 13 all original Clintoon screwups. Is this a lie?

    “We are developing a sensible nation missile defense, but we must not — not now, not by the year 2000 — squander $60 billion on an unproved, ineffective Star Wars program that could be obsolete tomorrow.”- Bill Clinton at the 1996 democratic convention! You see H.L. what Slick does not say is that everyone’s ENTIRE ASS could be obsolete if we did not!

    “We are fighting terrorism on all fronts with a three-prong strategy. First, we are working to rally a world coalition with zero tolerance for terrorism. Just this month I signed a law imposing harsh sanctions on foreign companies that invest in key sectors of the Iranian and Libyan economies. As long as Iran trains, supports, and protects terrorists, as long as Libya refuses to give up the people who blew up Pan Am 103, they will pay a price from the United States. “- Bill Clinton at the same crappy convention!

    Those three fronts must have been wait, tell ol’ Sandy to nut tuck the bad files, and blame the next president. Then Clinton has the gall to say that Iran should have to pay a price in the same stupo speech. I guess the price was them continuing to pay no price!