Here’s one from The Great Bartcop
Let me get
this straight…
Bush invades Iraq, kills tens of thousands of locals and 2700 soldiers
and the American whore press covers up for him and hides his crimes.
But Hugo Chavez calls Bush “the Devil” and he’s “an unstable crackpot?”
Speaking is worse than, say, 50,000 death women and children?
Nancy Pelosi came running to Bush’s rescue, calling the truth-teller,
“a thug.”
Why is Nancy Pelosi fighting for their team?
She didn’t have to endorse what Chavez said, but she could’ve said,
“Bush’s military aggression has caused hatred
all around the world.”
That’s a fact – she can’t get in trouble for saying the obvious,
but no,
she thinks the top House Democrat should run to the bully’s defense.
No doubt, Harry Reid ran to Bush’s defense, too.
Just a few years ago, Jesse Helms (Is he in Hell yet?) said “Clinton
better not
come to Carolina without bodyguards because
the troops might want to kill him.”
Sidebar:
The military hated Clinton because he never sent
a man into battle who didn’t come home.
They LOVE Bush for lying 2700 of them into their
graves. Why can’t they think better?
Did the GOP side with Clinton and condemn Helms?
No – they stick together because they want to win.
Democrats wouldn’t stick together if they fell into a vat of molasses.