We are the Liberal Blog From Hollywood
L.A.'s Premier Post Facility

L.A.'s Premier Post Facility

Photographer in L.A.

Hot Pics & Gossip.

Everyones First Reaction, Controlled Demolition

Posted in Main Blog (All Posts), Videos on September 11th, 2006 8:33 am by HL

This is from Prison Planet.com
First Reaction Was Controlled Demolition

Before the official mind control
script kicked in and remains 5 years to the day
Paul Everyone’s
First Reaction Was Controlled Demolition
Before the official mind control
script kicked in and remains 5 years to the day
Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | September 11 2006

Rarely highlighted footage
of an NBC news anchor commenting that the collapse of
the twin towers was by no means accidental and that it
was a planned event, emphasizes the point
that before the official mind control script was introduced
and parroted forevermore, everybody’s first reaction was
controlled demolition.

The NBC anchor featured
in this clip is simply reacting to the events he is witnessing
with common sense in stating that the collapse of the
trade towers was obviously a planned event and by no means
an accident or a simple consequence of jets hitting the
This was clearly
— the way the structure is collapsing — this was the
result of something that was planned.
This is not, it’s
not accidental that the first tower just happened to collapse
and then the second tower just happened to collapse in
exactly the same way.
How they accomplished
this, we don’t know. But clearly this is what happened.
TerrorStorm sets a new standard in documentary
filmmaking. Alex Jones knocks it out of the park yet again.
-Dylan Avery, Director, Loose Change – Click
to get the DVD or click
to watch online now!

This is what I
in the late afternoon of September
11, 2001.
The collapse of
the World Trade Center towers is also perplexing. They
clearly imploded as if being demolished by carefully placed
bombs within the building. The explanation that the aircraft
fuel from the Boeing caused the implosion doesn’t tally
with the footage of the event. Surely such a method would
produce a more inconsistent and graphic explosion? The
building collapsed symmetrically.

CBS News’ Dan Rather
also commented that the collapse of building 7, which
wasn’t hit by a plane, resembled a deliberate attempt
to demolish the structure using incendiary devices.
For the third time
today, it’s reminiscent of those pictures we’ve all seen
too much on television before when a building was deliberately
destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down.

NBC’s Pat Dawson reported
the working hypothesis of the FDNY in the immediate aftermath
of the towers’ collapse.
The chief of safety
of the Fire Department of New York City told me he received
word of a possibility of a secondary device — that is
another bomb going off. He tries to get his men out as
quickly as he could, but he said that there was another
explosion which took place and according to his theory,
he thinks that there were actually devices that were planted
in the building.

MSNBC news anchor Rick
Sanchez reported that police had found suspicious devices
in and around the WTC area and that the secondary explosions,
which were reported by numerous survivors, were thought
by police to be bombs.
Police have found
what they believe to be a suspicious device and they fear
that it may lead to another explosion.
I spoke with some
police officials moments ago, Chris, and they told me
they have reason to believe that one of the explosions
at the World Trade Center aside the ones caused by the
planes, may have been caused by a van that was parked
on the building that may have had an explosive device
in it.
During an exchange between
ABC’s Peter Jennings and reporter Don Dahler following
the collapse of the north tower, the first assumption
is again that controlled demolition must have been used
to take down the building.

Yes Peter its Don Dahler down here. I’m four blocks
north of the World Trade Center. The second building that
was hit by the plane has just completely collapsed.
The entire building
has just collapsed as if a demolition team set off….when
you see the old demolition of these old buildings. It
just folded in on itself and it is not there anymore.
Peter Jennings: If
you wish to bring, if anyone has ever watched a building
being demolished on purpose knows, that you’re going to
do this you have to get at the, at the under infrastructure
of a building and bring it down.

8 Responses to “Everyones First Reaction, Controlled Demolition”

  1. The Old Mule Says:

    After my own extensive research, 9/11 was a controlled demolition, an attack by domestic enemies (treason) and foreign a enemy (an act of war).

    What’s interesting is that so far, no Republican or Democrats have the guts to comment on this post.

    What’s the deal? Does the truth scare you? Or are you in denial of who may have committed the “crime of the century?”

  2. Buzz Says:

    I commented but it was removed because it made too much sense I guess. I watched the Discovery channels special on the colapse, funny they didn’t mention controlled demolition. The response will be that the Discovery channel is all part of the conspiricy so why even bother going into the detail.

  3. Buck Says:

    The conspiracy theory reminds me of a dying cockroach! ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!

  4. The Old Mule Says:

    Just like the conspiracy theories that Bush won the 2000 and 2004 elections? Or that Iraq had WMDs? Or that we’re winning in Iraq?

    You really have to be mentally challenged to believe anything the Bush administration says. So far, it smells like a conspiracy theory to me.

  5. Buzz Says:

    Well according to structural engineers it wasn’t a controlled demolition.

    Eventually, the loss of strength and stiffness of the materials resulting from the fire, combined with the initial impact damage, would have caused a failure of the truss system supporting a floor, or the remaining perimeter columns, or even the internal core, or some combination. Failure of the flooring system would have subsequently allowed the perimeter columns to buckle outwards. Regardless of which of these possibilities actually occurred, it would have resulted in the complete collapse of at least one complete storey at the level of impact.

    Once one storey collapsed all floors above would have begun to fall. The huge mass of falling structure would gain momentum, crushing the structurally intact floors below, resulting in catastrophic failure of the entire structure. While the columns at say level 50 were designed to carry the static load of 50 floors above, once one floor collapsed and the floors above started to fall, the dynamic load of 50 storeys above is very much greater, and the columns were almost instantly destroyed as each floor progressively “pancaked” to the ground.

    The perimeter tube design of the WTC was highly redundant. It survived the loss of several exterior columns due to aircraft impact, but the ensuing fire led to other steel failures. Many structural engineers believe that the weak points—the limiting factors on design allowables—were the angle clips that held the floor joists between the columns on the perimeter wall and the core structure (see Figure 5). With a 700 Pa floor design allowable, each floor should have been able to support approximately 1,300 t beyond its own weight. The total weight of each tower was about 500,000 t.

    In both cases, the combined effects of the airplane impacts and subsequent fires caused the buildings to collapse. The impacts severed load bearing columns and dislodged fireproofing from the structural steel. Heat from the fires then gradually weakened the structures, causing the floors to sag and the perimeter columns to bow inwards. The towers collapsed abruptly when the perimeter walls finally buckled. Once the collapse was initiated, the enormous weight of the portion of the towers above the impact areas overwhelmed the load bearing capacity of the structures beneath them. Total collapse was then inevitable.

    So this is what the people who know what they are talking about said about it. Does any of this get through anyones skull??

  6. Buck Says:

    You dont have to convince me Buzz. There is not a building on the face of the earth that could have withstood that. Each highrise took a jetliner at over 400 mph. The networld is litterd with the dying cockroach multiple flip flopping versions of the conspiracy theory.

  7. The Old Mule Says:

    It’s all just big conspiracy theories (sarcasm). It’s obvious that you aren’t curious and believe anything and everything YOUR President and his minions tell you. You probably still believe in tooth fairies or that the moon is made of cheese.

    That’s ok because everyday more and more Americans, experts, officials, scientists, chose to not believe the story that you believe. I suppose that all of us that don’t believe the official narrative are wrong and perhaps stupid people. But then again, what makes you right?

    By the way Buzz, nice cut and paste job. Now would you please cite your source of information? Or did you do your own “scientific” analysis to come up with your conclusions? What you posted is part of the official narrative of 2001 that I read years ago.

  8. april Says:

    Oh, no! I’m a Republican and I saw the experiment done with a rabbit cage and now I really believe!! Not!! BWAHAHAHA!!!