A. How many times under Bush has America been burned on nuclear deals with North Korea?
B. How many times under Clinton?
C. How many times has Bush lost his nuclear button code card?
E. How many times has Clinton?
F. How many nuclear weapon secrets from Los Alamos Laboratory did Bush loose to China?
G. How many did Clinton?
H. How many times under Bush. Sr. did you have to wait 10 days to buy a gun??
I. How many times under Clinton?
J. How many children have been burned up and shot up by the ATF under Bush??
K. How many under Clinton and Janet Reno??
L. How many times under Bush have you been told no tax cut unless you go to college.
m. How many times under Clinton?
n. How many years did Bush have to do something about Al Qaida before 9/11?
O. How many years did Clinton have??
P. How many times has Cheney claimed to invented oil?
q. What has Gore claimed to invented?
R. What would happen to you if you lied under oath?
s. How many time has Bush let a suicide terrorist leader into the white house?
t. How many times has Clinton?

Well first things first! IMZ, sweetheart (Im glad I know your a women now) I hate shades of grey. Now, when have I made bad comments about women? Because I pick up me another vote for for Bush when she ortherwise would not vote? Or what??

Now for the fun!! Mr. Tom! Red Ink Tom! ….That is you. That is my name for you. I am aware that you enjoy your TAX-A-CRAT-NESS! I am also now aware that “Republicant” and “Pustch” are your only guns. And you bore me Red Ink Tom with swinging some of the words over in italics. I set here unimpressed. I just got back from vacation and Im feeling nice this (USA) kicking ass evening. I will let you slide. Am I not merciful? You can call me Buck the merciful if you like. I got you figured out home-slice!!! Red Ink Tom, would you like to know why I have and do keep you dems figured out??

Well, because I ……..Republi-CAN!!! hee hee hee….Yeeeeeeehaw!!!!
If you could only see my evil grin. Buck out!!

I also see a question about the privileges enjoyed by the scions of prominent Democratic politicians, but no mention of the privileges enjoyed by the children of Republican’ts. Funny how you seem to find some sort of equivalence between recent incidents that weren’t even considered worthy of investigation by your fellow Republican’ts (referred to in the original quiz, which you couldn’t be bothered to answer) and unfounded slurs on Democratic politicians based on things which might have happened over fifty years ago.

I also see an awful lot of veiled references to biblical world views, and inferences that the words in a particular religious book should be considered as logical arguments that cannot be questioned or disagreed with. Which have no place in a reasoned debate that tries to use logic and rationality to discuss the issues brought into question.

I also see some sort of claim that there was an event only by single women and rich married white male liberals. I’m sure you could provide us with a complete guest list of that event, fifty years later, so that we could verify that your claim is reality-based, right? If not then STFU and keep your paranoid delusions to yourself.

Maybe you could drop a reference to Senator Byrd and his (long ago disavowed) Klan connections like the rest of your fellow Republican’ts while you’re at it! I hear that goes a long way with your Republican’t brethren.

Finally for now*, it looks like you distracted yourself during one of your irrational screeds, and thus missed ten out of the fifty questions you thought you were enough of a smart ass to put together. You can read all about it, along with some answers to your feeble attempts at a comeback, over at my blog later today.

* - and the crowd screams with enjoyment!

I agree, people who break the law should be punished. So yes, Teddy should have been punished. He got off because he’s a Kennedy. By the way, Laura killed her boyfriend in a drunk driving “accident” and got off scott free. So I don’t think your assessment that this is a liberal epidemic is accurate.

And several posters here show that the white patriarchy is alive and well: the privileged bourgeois pig dismisses the opinion of a female who dares to think for herself with name-calling and crude sexual reference.

UH . . . lechery?

Funny how you just sort of glossed over all of the inconvenient truths that were pointed out to everyone in the original fifty questions, and tried to plant some Repugnican’t spin of your own to try and bring a false comparison to the table. Too bad there’s lots of people like me who see through your kimchee and aren’t afraid to point out how much of hypocritical traitor you are.

Funny how you whine about people hurting your feelings, after over forty years of constantly worse insults coming at anyone who has not drunk the Reich wing kool-aid. Amazingly, it seems that a lot of fellow Repugnican’ts are finally getting a small taste of the vitriol they have dumped on everybody else, and they don’t like it! Imagine the surprise, to those of us who have had to deal with it all of our lives. Especially those of us who are not enthralled with the only other choice given to us, and think they’re all a bunch of crooks who should be thrown out - but still get lumped in with the Democrats when the Reich wing hate starts flowing.

Why should we even think about bothering to answer you, when you can’t be bothered to answer the questions that brought about the original post? Why is it you feel entitled to ask questions, when you are too impolite to answer them? And why should anyone treat you with any sort of respect when you support an illegally installed drunken cokeheaded traitor who’s murdering our nation’s children (along with a lot of children in other countries, too) so he can stuff oil money into his greedy friends pockets, and the rest of his traitorous activities?

Now that you’ve been exposed as a Repugnican’t plant , why should we even bother dealing with your nonsense (other than to point out how much of a plant you are) at all?

6. Would you keep a Guantanamo detainee in your home if that would hasten the closure of the prison at Guantanamo?

What kind of stupid question is this? Do you think we don’t have enough prison space here, to keep them until they are tried, and most of them are acquitted???

7. One of the tenets of Islam is that non-believers are inferior. In order to show proper respect to your detainee’s culture and beliefs, would you and your family convert to Islam?

You are retarded aren’t you? So I guess that you think that just because they are Islamic that they can be held forever without trial? I think you are inferior, so are you going to become a Liberal???

10. List the reasons why you would or would not invite the Democratic Party to take pictures of your grandmother’s casket for the purpose of producing a fund-raising ad. Would it make any difference in your answer if Howard Dean showed up uninvited with a video camera and started filming the service?

My grandmother would have nothing to do with the Iraq war, You are off your meds aren’t you. But if I had a relative that died in Iraq I would let them film the flag draped casket, to make an anti-war ad. or if it would help get rid of Bush.

13.Would you allow Ted Kennedy drive the bridesmaids to the church for your daughter’s wedding? Estimate how many bridesmaids would arrive at the church alive if they were so chauffeured.

Ted Kennedy has been a United States Senator for over 40 years. Under what scenario would he have to become a chaffeur

(Cue the twilight zone music)

If anyone on this board isn’t getting any its you.

Since I’m asking the questions around here, Here are a couple of my reality based questions for you.

1. How Many U.S. Soldiers Died During Bill Clintons Presidency, How many under Bush?

2. How Many Americans died in terrorist attacks on U.S. Soil under Clinton? How many under Bush?

3. What was the highest price of a gallon of gas under Clinton, and for Bush??

4. How many Americans have lost their health insurance under Bush?

5. How many Cities were washed away because Bill Clinton because he took money to repair levees and sent it to fight a war that he lied us into?

6. What was Bill Clintons lowest approval rating? What was Bush’s?

7. How many elections did Bill Clinton steal? How many did Bush steal?

I could go on and on with these reality based questions but I’ll let you answer these first.

However, judging by the pinched little spincters around here, it doesn’t look like many people are getting any (and no, I am not interested).

However, re-read my questions: they are full of inconvenient truths. If you can bring yourself to face them.

9. Barbra Streisand makes her movies in Canada, where there are no unions and costs are cheaper. Explain how this helps the American worker in the quest for a “living wage.”

Actually, there are many unions in Canada, including one for the actors, called the Canadian Actors’ Equity Association. So no explanation is necessary to answer this question, other than to explain to the studio audience that you are asking a nonsense question which seems to be intended to spread false propagande in these comments, and distract everyone from focusing on the knowledge that conservatives can’t even answer some realtively simple questions.

Stick it where the sun doesn’t shine, motherCheneying Repugnican’t whore.

No one is demanding that you answer the questions asked of you. But (at least on my part - I don’t presume to speak for others like some traitors I could mention whose name starts with ‘an’ and ends with ‘ita’) I am saying that, since you refused to answer the questions asked of conservative Putsch supporters, you have no standing, no business, and no right to expect anyone to answer your questions. So much for the “right” of any of the commenters here to throw the debate off-track by injecting Norquist BlaastFaxx talking points into the discussion. And demanding answers from the rest of the comenters here.

Glad to see that your lies about being a former Democrat are proven by your supposed repugnance of discourteous Democratic groupthink while embracing the Repugnican’t groupthink (as evidenced by your Kennedy fixation, among other Repugnican’t slogans within your set of “questions”). What’s that word again? Hyp-, hypo-, Repugnican’t! Yeah - that’s the ticket…

Also glad to see that, even though I am not and never have been a Democrat, you attribute my “sloganeering” to the Democrats. Wouldn’t want to bother that fluffy little melon with any independent thoughts, now would you?

The questions for progressives were written by me, and I am curious if anyone who has called me names can answer even one of them.

Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s criticism of the Great Society programs remain as valid today as in the 1960’s. For those too young to remember, Moynihan was undesecretary of labor in the LBJ administration, and was later ambassador to the UN and Senator from New York. He was a Democrat who did not allow himself to be shouted down by the less-courteous members of his party.

Slogans are an interesting way to shout down opposing points of view. The kind of discourteous groupthink exhibited here is why I am no longer a Democrat.

We apologize for the inconvenience. Which is of course more than any Repugnican’t filth can do - they’re not sorry about being traitorous thugs at all!